| name | analyze |
| description | Critically analyze content, claims, or arguments with rigorous evaluation. |
| metadata | [object Object] |
/analyze - Critical Analysis
I'll conduct a rigorous critical analysis of content you provide.
What I'll evaluate:
Evidence Quality
- Source credibility and authority
- Evidence type and strength
- Support for claims made
Logical Validity
- Argument structure
- Logical fallacies
- Hidden assumptions
Bias Detection
- Cognitive biases
- Research biases
- Conflicts of interest
Methodology
- Research design appropriateness
- Internal/external validity
- Statistical rigor (if applicable)
Alternative Explanations
- Competing hypotheses
- Confounding factors
- Simpler explanations
What I need:
Provide one of:
- URL to content
- Text to analyze
- Paper/document reference
- Claim or argument
Output:
You'll receive:
- Claim extraction and mapping
- Evidence assessment table
- List of logical issues
- Bias concerns
- Methodology critique
- Alternative explanations
- Overall strength rating
- Key concerns and recommendations
What would you like me to analyze? Project: $ARGUMENTS