| name | literature-review |
| description | Conducts systematic literature reviews with academic rigor. Use when you need to understand existing research on a topic, identify research gaps, trace the evolution of ideas, or build a comprehensive bibliography. Triggers on phrases like "literature review", "what does research say", "find papers on", "academic sources for", "systematic review of". |
| tools | WebSearch, WebFetch, Read, Grep, Glob |
Systematic Literature Review
This skill guides you through conducting a PhD-level literature review.
Phase 1: Scope Definition
Before searching, clearly define:
Research Question
- What specific question are you investigating?
- Is it focused enough to be answerable?
- Is it broad enough to find relevant literature?
Inclusion Criteria
- Time range: How far back to search?
- Source types: Peer-reviewed only? Include preprints?
- Language: English only or multilingual?
- Geographic scope: Any regional focus?
- Discipline: Single field or interdisciplinary?
Exclusion Criteria
- What types of sources to exclude?
- Quality thresholds (e.g., minimum citations)?
CHECKPOINT: Confirm scope with user before proceeding.
Phase 2: Search Strategy
Search Term Development
- Identify key concepts from research question
- List synonyms and related terms for each concept
- Include both technical and common terms
- Consider field-specific vocabulary
Boolean Query Construction
(concept1 OR synonym1a OR synonym1b)
AND
(concept2 OR synonym2a OR synonym2b)
AND
(concept3 OR synonym3a)
Database Selection
Execute searches using WebSearch with site filters:
site:arxiv.org- Preprints (CS, physics, math)site:scholar.google.com- Broad academicsite:semanticscholar.org- AI-powered discoverysite:pubmed.gov- Biomedicalsite:ssrn.com- Social sciences, economicssite:acm.org- Computer science
Phase 3: Source Retrieval and Screening
Initial Screening
For each result:
- Check title relevance
- Read abstract
- Assess publication quality
- Decide include/exclude
Full-Text Retrieval
Use WebFetch to get:
- Full paper content (if available)
- Key sections (methods, results, discussion)
- Reference lists for citation chaining
Citation Chaining
- Backward: Check references of key papers
- Forward: Find papers citing key works
Phase 4: Quality Assessment
Rate each source:
| Criterion | Score (1-5) |
|---|---|
| Authority (author credentials, institution) | |
| Publication venue (impact, peer review) | |
| Methodology (rigor, validity) | |
| Currency (recency, field relevance) | |
| Relevance (alignment with question) |
Minimum threshold: Average score ≥ 3
Phase 5: Data Extraction
For each included source, extract:
- Full citation information
- Key findings
- Methodology
- Theoretical framework
- Limitations noted
- Relevance to research question
Phase 6: Synthesis
Thematic Organization
Group sources by:
- Theoretical approach
- Methodology
- Findings/conclusions
- Time period
Pattern Identification
- Where do sources agree?
- Where do they conflict?
- How has thinking evolved?
- What methods dominate?
Gap Analysis
- What questions remain unanswered?
- What populations/contexts are understudied?
- What methods haven't been applied?
- What theoretical gaps exist?
CHECKPOINT: Present synthesis summary for user review.
Phase 7: Documentation
Output Structure
# Literature Review: [Topic]
## Research Question
[Stated question]
## Search Strategy
- Databases: [List]
- Search terms: [Query]
- Date range: [Range]
- Inclusion criteria: [List]
## Sources Identified
- Total found: [N]
- After screening: [N]
- Included: [N]
## Thematic Analysis
### Theme 1: [Name]
[Summary with citations]
### Theme 2: [Name]
[Summary with citations]
## Research Gaps
1. [Gap with evidence]
2. [Gap with evidence]
## Key Sources
[Annotated bibliography]
## References
[Formatted citations]