| name | chaos-engineering-resilience |
| description | Chaos engineering principles, controlled failure injection, resilience testing, and system recovery validation. Use when testing distributed systems, building confidence in fault tolerance, or validating disaster recovery. |
| category | specialized-testing |
| priority | high |
| tokenEstimate | 900 |
| agents | qe-chaos-engineer, qe-performance-tester, qe-production-intelligence |
| implementation_status | optimized |
| optimization_version | 1 |
| last_optimized | Tue Dec 02 2025 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) |
| dependencies | |
| quick_reference_card | true |
| tags | chaos, resilience, fault-injection, distributed-systems, recovery, netflix |
Chaos Engineering & Resilience Testing
Quick Chaos Steps:
- Start small: Dev → Staging → 1% prod → gradual rollout
- Define clear rollback triggers (error_rate > 5%)
- Measure blast radius, never exceed planned scope
- Document findings → runbooks → improved resilience
Critical Success Factors:
- Controlled experiments with automatic rollback
- Steady state must be measurable
- Start in non-production, graduate to production
Quick Reference Card
When to Use
- Distributed systems validation
- Disaster recovery testing
- Building confidence in fault tolerance
- Pre-production resilience verification
Failure Types to Inject
| Category | Failures | Tools |
|---|---|---|
| Network | Latency, packet loss, partition | tc, toxiproxy |
| Infrastructure | Instance kill, disk failure, CPU | Chaos Monkey |
| Application | Exceptions, slow responses, leaks | Gremlin, LitmusChaos |
| Dependencies | Service outage, timeout | WireMock |
Blast Radius Progression
Dev (safe) → Staging → 1% prod → 10% → 50% → 100%
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
Learn Validate Careful Full confidence
Steady State Metrics
| Metric | Normal | Alert Threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Error rate | < 0.1% | > 1% |
| p99 latency | < 200ms | > 500ms |
| Throughput | baseline | -20% |
Chaos Experiment Structure
// Chaos experiment definition
const experiment = {
name: 'Database latency injection',
hypothesis: 'System handles 500ms DB latency gracefully',
steadyState: {
errorRate: '< 0.1%',
p99Latency: '< 300ms'
},
method: {
type: 'network-latency',
target: 'database',
delay: '500ms',
duration: '5m'
},
rollback: {
automatic: true,
trigger: 'errorRate > 5%'
}
};
Agent-Driven Chaos
// qe-chaos-engineer runs controlled experiments
await Task("Chaos Experiment", {
target: 'payment-service',
failure: 'terminate-random-instance',
blastRadius: '10%',
duration: '5m',
steadyStateHypothesis: {
metric: 'success-rate',
threshold: 0.99
},
autoRollback: true
}, "qe-chaos-engineer");
// Validates:
// - System recovers automatically
// - Error rate stays within threshold
// - No data loss
// - Alerts triggered appropriately
Agent Coordination Hints
Memory Namespace
aqe/chaos-engineering/
├── experiments/* - Experiment definitions & results
├── steady-states/* - Baseline measurements
├── runbooks/* - Generated recovery procedures
└── blast-radius/* - Impact analysis
Fleet Coordination
const chaosFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
strategy: 'chaos-engineering',
agents: [
'qe-chaos-engineer', // Experiment execution
'qe-performance-tester', // Baseline metrics
'qe-production-intelligence' // Production monitoring
],
topology: 'sequential'
});
Related Skills
- shift-right-testing - Production testing
- performance-testing - Load testing
- test-environment-management - Environment stability
Remember
Break things on purpose to prevent unplanned outages. Find weaknesses before users do. Define steady state, inject failures, measure impact, fix weaknesses, create runbooks. Start small, increase blast radius gradually.
With Agents: qe-chaos-engineer automates chaos experiments with blast radius control, automatic rollback, and comprehensive resilience validation. Generates runbooks from experiment results.