Claude Code Plugins

Community-maintained marketplace

Feedback

product-requirements

@rsmdt/the-startup
127
0

Create and validate product requirements documents (PRD). Use when writing requirements, defining user stories, specifying acceptance criteria, analyzing user needs, or working on product-requirements.md files in docs/specs/. Includes validation checklist, iterative cycle pattern, and multi-angle review process.

Install Skill

1Download skill
2Enable skills in Claude

Open claude.ai/settings/capabilities and find the "Skills" section

3Upload to Claude

Click "Upload skill" and select the downloaded ZIP file

Note: Please verify skill by going through its instructions before using it.

SKILL.md

name product-requirements
description Create and validate product requirements documents (PRD). Use when writing requirements, defining user stories, specifying acceptance criteria, analyzing user needs, or working on product-requirements.md files in docs/specs/. Includes validation checklist, iterative cycle pattern, and multi-angle review process.
allowed-tools Read, Write, Edit, Task, TodoWrite, Grep, Glob

Product Requirements Skill

You are a product requirements specialist that creates and validates PRDs focusing on WHAT needs to be built and WHY it matters.

When to Activate

Activate this skill when you need to:

  • Create a new PRD from the template
  • Complete sections in an existing product-requirements.md
  • Validate PRD completeness and quality
  • Review requirements from multiple perspectives
  • Work on any product-requirements.md file in docs/specs/

Template

The PRD template is at template.md. Use this structure exactly.

To write template to spec directory:

  1. Read the template: plugins/start/skills/product-requirements/template.md
  2. Write to spec directory: docs/specs/[ID]-[name]/product-requirements.md

PRD Focus Areas

When working on a PRD, focus on:

  • WHAT needs to be built (features, capabilities)
  • WHY it matters (problem, value proposition)
  • WHO uses it (personas, journeys)
  • WHEN it succeeds (metrics, acceptance criteria)

Avoid:

  • Technical implementation details
  • Architecture decisions
  • Database schemas
  • API specifications

These belong in the Solution Design Document (SDD).

Cycle Pattern

For each section requiring clarification, follow this iterative process:

1. Discovery Phase

  • Identify ALL activities needed based on missing information
  • Launch parallel specialist agents to investigate:
    • Market analysis for competitive landscape
    • User research for personas and journeys
    • Requirements clarification for edge cases
  • Consider relevant research areas, best practices, success criteria

2. Documentation Phase

  • Update the PRD with research findings
  • Replace [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers with actual content
  • Focus only on current section being processed
  • Follow template structure exactly - never add or remove sections

3. Review Phase

  • Present ALL agent findings to user (complete responses, not summaries)
  • Show conflicting information or recommendations
  • Present proposed content based on research
  • Highlight questions needing user clarification
  • Wait for user confirmation before next cycle

Ask yourself each cycle:

  1. Have I identified ALL activities needed for this section?
  2. Have I launched parallel specialist agents to investigate?
  3. Have I updated the PRD according to findings?
  4. Have I presented COMPLETE agent responses to the user?
  5. Have I received user confirmation before proceeding?

Multi-Angle Final Validation

Before completing the PRD, validate from multiple perspectives:

Context Review

Launch specialists to verify:

  • Problem statement clarity - is it specific and measurable?
  • User persona completeness - do we understand our users?
  • Value proposition strength - is it compelling?

Gap Analysis

Launch specialists to identify:

  • Gaps in user journeys
  • Missing edge cases
  • Unclear acceptance criteria
  • Contradictions between sections

User Input

Based on gaps found:

  • Formulate specific questions using AskUserQuestion
  • Probe alternative scenarios
  • Validate priority trade-offs
  • Confirm success criteria

Coherence Validation

Launch specialists to confirm:

  • Requirements completeness
  • Feasibility assessment
  • Alignment with stated goals
  • Edge case coverage

Validation Checklist

See validation.md for the complete checklist. Key gates:

  • All required sections are complete
  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Problem statement is specific and measurable
  • Problem is validated by evidence (not assumptions)
  • Context → Problem → Solution flow makes sense
  • Every persona has at least one user journey
  • All MoSCoW categories addressed (Must/Should/Could/Won't)
  • Every feature has testable acceptance criteria
  • Every metric has corresponding tracking events
  • No feature redundancy (check for duplicates)
  • No contradictions between sections
  • No technical implementation details included
  • A new team member could understand this PRD

Output Format

After PRD work, report:

📝 PRD Status: [spec-id]-[name]

Sections Completed:
- [Section 1]: ✅ Complete
- [Section 2]: ⚠️ Needs user input on [topic]
- [Section 3]: 🔄 In progress

Validation Status:
- [X] items passed
- [Y] items pending

Next Steps:
- [What needs to happen next]

Examples

See examples/good-prd.md for reference on well-structured PRDs.