Claude Code Plugins

Community-maintained marketplace

Feedback

component-usage-analysis

@schalkneethling/webdev-agent-skills
0
0

Analyse component dependencies and usage patterns in a Drupal/Twig component library. Use when user asks to find where a component is used, check if a component can be safely removed, audit component dependencies, find components using specific properties, or analyse impact of refactoring a component.

Install Skill

1Download skill
2Enable skills in Claude

Open claude.ai/settings/capabilities and find the "Skills" section

3Upload to Claude

Click "Upload skill" and select the downloaded ZIP file

Note: Please verify skill by going through its instructions before using it.

SKILL.md

name component-usage-analysis
description Analyse component dependencies and usage patterns in a Drupal/Twig component library. Use when user asks to find where a component is used, check if a component can be safely removed, audit component dependencies, find components using specific properties, or analyse impact of refactoring a component.

Component Usage Analysis

Analyse component dependencies and usage patterns to support safe refactoring and removal.

Trigger Phrases

  • "Find all usages of <component>"
  • "Which components use <component>?"
  • "Check if <component> can be safely removed"
  • "Find components using <component> with property X"
  • "Audit dependencies for <component>"
  • "What would break if I change <component>?"

Configuration

This skill assumes the component library structure:

apps/component-library/
├── src/components/
│   ├── elements/
│   ├── patterns/
│   ├── template-components/
│   └── templates/

Analysis Methodology

Step 1: Identify the Target

Clarify with the user:

  1. Target component: Which component to analyse (e.g., elements/image)
  2. Properties of interest: Specific properties to filter by (optional)
  3. Analysis goal: Usage audit, removal check, or refactoring impact

Step 2: Twig Include Analysis

Find all components that include the target via Twig.

Search pattern:

grep -rn "{% include \"@<tier>/<component>" src/components/

Example for elements/image:

grep -rn '{% include "@elements/image' src/components/

For each match:

  1. Note the file path (consuming component)
  2. Extract the with {} block to identify which properties are passed
  3. Record whether target properties are present

Extracting the with block:

Twig includes may span multiple lines:

{% include "@elements/image/image.twig" with {
    src: item.image.src,
    alt: item.image.alt,
    description: item.image.description
} %}

Use multi-line search or examine files directly when the with block is complex.

See references/search-patterns.md for detailed patterns.

Step 3: Mock Reference Analysis

Find all components whose mocks reference the target component.

Search pattern:

grep -rn '\$ref: <tier>/<component>#' src/components/

Example for elements/image:

grep -rn '\$ref: elements/image#' src/components/

For each match:

  1. Note the file path and variant name referenced
  2. Look up the referenced variant in the target's mocks.yaml
  3. Check if the variant includes the properties of interest

Cross-referencing variants:

If a mock uses $ref: elements/image#with-caption, check elements/image/mocks.yaml to see what properties that variant defines.

Step 4: Categorise Results

Group findings into categories based on the analysis goal:

For property-specific analysis:

  • Uses WITH property X: Components that pass/use the property
  • Uses WITHOUT property X: Components that use the target but don't use property X

For removal analysis:

  • Direct Twig includes: Would break immediately
  • Mock references only: May need mock updates but won't break rendering
  • No dependencies: Safe to remove

For refactoring analysis:

  • Affected by change: Components using the property/feature being changed
  • Unaffected: Components using the target but not the changed aspect

Step 5: Verification

Ensure comprehensive coverage before reporting:

  1. Count total files:

    find src/components -name "*.twig" | wc -l
    find src/components -name "mocks.yaml" | wc -l
    
  2. Verify search found expected files:

    • Spot-check known usages
    • Confirm count matches expectations
  3. Check for alternative patterns:

    • Embedded includes: {% include "@elements/image/image.twig" %}
    • Variable includes: {% include image_template %}
    • Embed blocks: {% embed "@elements/image/image.twig" %}
  4. Report confidence level:

    • High: All patterns checked, counts verified
    • Medium: Primary patterns checked
    • Low: Quick scan only

Output Format

Provide results in a clear structure:

## Component Usage Analysis: <component>

### Summary
- Total usages found: X
- Twig includes: Y
- Mock references: Z

### Uses WITH <property>
1. `patterns/card/card.twig` - passes description in with block
2. `patterns/teaser/mocks.yaml` - references variant with description

### Uses WITHOUT <property>
1. `patterns/hero/hero.twig` - only passes src, alt
2. `template-components/header/mocks.yaml` - references minimal variant

### Verification
- Searched X .twig files
- Searched Y mocks.yaml files
- Confidence: High

Common Scenarios

Scenario: Removing a Property

User: "Can I remove the copyright property from elements/image?"

  1. Search for Twig includes passing copyright
  2. Search for mock references to variants with copyright
  3. Report which components would need updates
  4. Recommend: Update consumers first, then remove property

Scenario: Safe Component Removal

User: "Is elements/legacy-button used anywhere?"

  1. Search for Twig includes of the component
  2. Search for mock references
  3. Search for library references in templates
  4. If zero results across all searches → safe to remove

Scenario: Refactoring Impact

User: "I want to rename description to caption in elements/image"

  1. Find all usages passing description
  2. Provide list of files requiring updates
  3. Estimate scope of change

Notes

  • Always verify comprehensively before recommending removal
  • Check both Twig files AND mocks.yaml files
  • Consider indirect dependencies (component A uses B which uses C)
  • Report confidence level with results