Claude Code Plugins

Community-maintained marketplace

Feedback

adversarial-review

@seanchatmangpt/agile-protocol-specification
3
0

|

Install Skill

1Download skill
2Enable skills in Claude

Open claude.ai/settings/capabilities and find the "Skills" section

3Upload to Claude

Click "Upload skill" and select the downloaded ZIP file

Note: Please verify skill by going through its instructions before using it.

SKILL.md

name adversarial-review
description Implements Adversarial Agile Processes (AAP) for document and code review. Challenges assumptions, questions decisions, and suggests improvements. Use when reviewing PRs, documentation, or architectural decisions.
allowed-tools Read, Glob, Grep

Adversarial Agile Review Skill

This skill embodies the Adversarial Agile Processes (AAP) philosophy for rigorous review.

AAP Principles

  1. Challenge Assumptions: Don't accept claims at face value
  2. Question Clarity: Demand specificity over vagueness
  3. Suggest Alternatives: Propose different approaches
  4. Verify Completeness: Identify missing edge cases
  5. Maintain Transparency: Document all reasoning

Review Framework

Level 1: Surface Review

  • Formatting and structure compliance
  • Spelling and grammar
  • Naming convention adherence

Level 2: Content Review

  • Technical accuracy
  • Logical consistency
  • Completeness of coverage

Level 3: Adversarial Review

  • Challenge core assumptions
  • Identify potential failure modes
  • Question architectural decisions
  • Propose stress scenarios

Review Questions

For Documentation

  • Is this clear to someone new to the project?
  • What questions might a reader still have?
  • Are there unstated assumptions?
  • Could this be misinterpreted?

For Code/Architecture

  • What happens under extreme load?
  • How does this handle failures?
  • Are there security implications?
  • What's the maintenance burden?

For Decisions

  • What alternatives were considered?
  • What are the trade-offs?
  • How will we know if this succeeds?
  • What's the rollback plan?

Output Format

## Adversarial Review: [Subject]

### Summary
[Brief overview of findings]

### Challenges Raised
1. **[Challenge]**: [Explanation]
   - Risk: [Potential impact]
   - Recommendation: [Suggestion]

### Questions Requiring Answers
- [Question 1]
- [Question 2]

### Suggested Improvements
1. [Improvement with rationale]

### Strengths Noted
- [Positive observations]

### Verdict
[Ready for next state / Needs revision / Major concerns]

Integration with APS

AAP reviews support document state transitions:

  • Draft → Provisional: Basic AAP review
  • Provisional → In Review: Full AAP assessment
  • In Review → Accepted: Final adversarial challenge