| name | Code Quality Metrics |
| description | This skill should be used when the user asks about "code complexity", "cyclomatic complexity", "cognitive complexity", "code metrics", "maintainability index", "code coverage", or when measuring code quality quantitatively. Provides metrics thresholds and measurement techniques. |
| version | 0.1.0 |
Code Quality Metrics Guide
Overview
Code quality metrics provide quantitative measures of code characteristics. This skill covers complexity metrics, maintainability indices, and their practical thresholds across different languages.
Complexity Metrics
Cyclomatic Complexity (CC)
Measures the number of linearly independent paths through code.
Calculation: CC = E - N + 2P
- E = edges in control flow graph
- N = nodes in control flow graph
- P = connected components (usually 1)
Simplified: Count decision points + 1
- Each
if,elif,else,for,while,case,catch,&&,||,?:adds 1
Thresholds:
| Range | Risk | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 1-10 | Low | Simple, well-structured |
| 11-20 | Moderate | More complex, consider refactoring |
| 21-50 | High | Complex, difficult to test |
| >50 | Very High | Untestable, must refactor |
Cognitive Complexity
Measures how difficult code is to understand (introduced by SonarQube).
Key differences from CC:
- Penalizes nested structures more heavily
- Doesn't count all decision points equally
- Focuses on human comprehension
Calculation rules:
- +1 for each break in linear flow (
if,for,while,switch,catch,?:) - +1 for each nesting level inside these structures
- +1 for binary logical operators (
&&,||) - Recursion adds +1
Thresholds:
| Range | Assessment |
|---|---|
| 0-7 | Easy to understand |
| 8-15 | Moderate complexity |
| 16-24 | High complexity, refactor |
| 25+ | Very high, immediate refactoring |
Example:
def process(items): # 0
for item in items: # +1 (loop)
if item.active: # +1 (if) +1 (nesting=1)
if item.valid: # +1 (if) +2 (nesting=2)
handle(item)
return items # Total: 6
Halstead Metrics
Based on counting operators and operands:
| Metric | Formula | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Vocabulary | n = n1 + n2 | Unique operators + operands |
| Length | N = N1 + N2 | Total operators + operands |
| Volume | V = N × log2(n) | Size of implementation |
| Difficulty | D = (n1/2) × (N2/n2) | Error-proneness |
| Effort | E = D × V | Mental effort to understand |
Maintainability Metrics
Maintainability Index (MI)
Composite metric combining complexity, size, and comments.
Formula: MI = 171 - 5.2 × ln(V) - 0.23 × CC - 16.2 × ln(LOC)
Thresholds:
| Range | Maintainability |
|---|---|
| 85-100 | High maintainability |
| 65-84 | Moderate maintainability |
| 0-64 | Low maintainability |
Lines of Code (LOC)
| Metric | Description | Threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Physical LOC | All lines including blanks/comments | Method: <100, Class: <500 |
| Logical LOC | Executable statements | Method: <30, Class: <200 |
| Comment Ratio | Comments / Total | 10-30% typical |
Coupling Metrics
Afferent Coupling (Ca)
Number of classes that depend on this class.
- High Ca = Many dependents, changes are risky
Efferent Coupling (Ce)
Number of classes this class depends on.
- High Ce = Many dependencies, class is fragile
Instability (I)
I = Ce / (Ca + Ce)
- 0 = Stable (many dependents, few dependencies)
- 1 = Unstable (few dependents, many dependencies)
Cohesion Metrics
Lack of Cohesion of Methods (LCOM)
Measures how related methods are within a class.
LCOM1: Number of method pairs without shared instance variables
- 0 = Perfect cohesion
- High = Low cohesion, consider splitting
LCOM4: Number of connected components in method-field graph
- 1 = Cohesive class
1 = Multiple responsibilities
Quick Reference Table
| Metric | Tool | Good | Warning | Critical |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cyclomatic | ESLint, SonarQube | ≤10 | 11-20 | >20 |
| Cognitive | SonarQube | ≤15 | 16-24 | >24 |
| Method LOC | - | ≤30 | 31-50 | >50 |
| Class LOC | - | ≤300 | 301-500 | >500 |
| Parameters | ESLint | ≤3 | 4-5 | >5 |
| Nesting Depth | ESLint | ≤3 | 4 | >4 |
| LCOM4 | - | 1 | 2 | >2 |
Measurement Commands
ESLint Complexity
npx eslint --rule 'complexity: ["error", 10]' src/
SonarQube Analysis
sonar-scanner -Dsonar.projectKey=myproject
Python Radon
radon cc src/ -a -s # Cyclomatic complexity
radon mi src/ -s # Maintainability index
Additional Resources
Reference Files
For detailed measurement techniques:
references/measurement-tools.md- Tool configurations and usagereferences/thresholds-by-language.md- Language-specific thresholds
Integration with Other Skills
Combine with:
solid-principlesfor structural analysisrefactoring-patternsfor improvement strategies