Claude Code Plugins

Community-maintained marketplace

Feedback
0
0

This skill should be used when the user asks about "code complexity", "cyclomatic complexity", "cognitive complexity", "code metrics", "maintainability index", "code coverage", or when measuring code quality quantitatively. Provides metrics thresholds and measurement techniques.

Install Skill

1Download skill
2Enable skills in Claude

Open claude.ai/settings/capabilities and find the "Skills" section

3Upload to Claude

Click "Upload skill" and select the downloaded ZIP file

Note: Please verify skill by going through its instructions before using it.

SKILL.md

name Code Quality Metrics
description This skill should be used when the user asks about "code complexity", "cyclomatic complexity", "cognitive complexity", "code metrics", "maintainability index", "code coverage", or when measuring code quality quantitatively. Provides metrics thresholds and measurement techniques.
version 0.1.0

Code Quality Metrics Guide

Overview

Code quality metrics provide quantitative measures of code characteristics. This skill covers complexity metrics, maintainability indices, and their practical thresholds across different languages.

Complexity Metrics

Cyclomatic Complexity (CC)

Measures the number of linearly independent paths through code.

Calculation: CC = E - N + 2P

  • E = edges in control flow graph
  • N = nodes in control flow graph
  • P = connected components (usually 1)

Simplified: Count decision points + 1

  • Each if, elif, else, for, while, case, catch, &&, ||, ?: adds 1

Thresholds:

Range Risk Action
1-10 Low Simple, well-structured
11-20 Moderate More complex, consider refactoring
21-50 High Complex, difficult to test
>50 Very High Untestable, must refactor

Cognitive Complexity

Measures how difficult code is to understand (introduced by SonarQube).

Key differences from CC:

  • Penalizes nested structures more heavily
  • Doesn't count all decision points equally
  • Focuses on human comprehension

Calculation rules:

  1. +1 for each break in linear flow (if, for, while, switch, catch, ?:)
  2. +1 for each nesting level inside these structures
  3. +1 for binary logical operators (&&, ||)
  4. Recursion adds +1

Thresholds:

Range Assessment
0-7 Easy to understand
8-15 Moderate complexity
16-24 High complexity, refactor
25+ Very high, immediate refactoring

Example:

def process(items):           # 0
    for item in items:        # +1 (loop)
        if item.active:       # +1 (if) +1 (nesting=1)
            if item.valid:    # +1 (if) +2 (nesting=2)
                handle(item)
    return items              # Total: 6

Halstead Metrics

Based on counting operators and operands:

Metric Formula Meaning
Vocabulary n = n1 + n2 Unique operators + operands
Length N = N1 + N2 Total operators + operands
Volume V = N × log2(n) Size of implementation
Difficulty D = (n1/2) × (N2/n2) Error-proneness
Effort E = D × V Mental effort to understand

Maintainability Metrics

Maintainability Index (MI)

Composite metric combining complexity, size, and comments.

Formula: MI = 171 - 5.2 × ln(V) - 0.23 × CC - 16.2 × ln(LOC)

Thresholds:

Range Maintainability
85-100 High maintainability
65-84 Moderate maintainability
0-64 Low maintainability

Lines of Code (LOC)

Metric Description Threshold
Physical LOC All lines including blanks/comments Method: <100, Class: <500
Logical LOC Executable statements Method: <30, Class: <200
Comment Ratio Comments / Total 10-30% typical

Coupling Metrics

Afferent Coupling (Ca)

Number of classes that depend on this class.

  • High Ca = Many dependents, changes are risky

Efferent Coupling (Ce)

Number of classes this class depends on.

  • High Ce = Many dependencies, class is fragile

Instability (I)

I = Ce / (Ca + Ce)

  • 0 = Stable (many dependents, few dependencies)
  • 1 = Unstable (few dependents, many dependencies)

Cohesion Metrics

Lack of Cohesion of Methods (LCOM)

Measures how related methods are within a class.

LCOM1: Number of method pairs without shared instance variables

  • 0 = Perfect cohesion
  • High = Low cohesion, consider splitting

LCOM4: Number of connected components in method-field graph

  • 1 = Cohesive class
  • 1 = Multiple responsibilities

Quick Reference Table

Metric Tool Good Warning Critical
Cyclomatic ESLint, SonarQube ≤10 11-20 >20
Cognitive SonarQube ≤15 16-24 >24
Method LOC - ≤30 31-50 >50
Class LOC - ≤300 301-500 >500
Parameters ESLint ≤3 4-5 >5
Nesting Depth ESLint ≤3 4 >4
LCOM4 - 1 2 >2

Measurement Commands

ESLint Complexity

npx eslint --rule 'complexity: ["error", 10]' src/

SonarQube Analysis

sonar-scanner -Dsonar.projectKey=myproject

Python Radon

radon cc src/ -a -s  # Cyclomatic complexity
radon mi src/ -s     # Maintainability index

Additional Resources

Reference Files

For detailed measurement techniques:

  • references/measurement-tools.md - Tool configurations and usage
  • references/thresholds-by-language.md - Language-specific thresholds

Integration with Other Skills

Combine with:

  • solid-principles for structural analysis
  • refactoring-patterns for improvement strategies