| name | agent-development |
| description | This skill should be used when the user asks to "create an agent", "add an agent", "write a subagent", "agent frontmatter", "when to use description", "agent examples", "agent tools", "agent colors", "autonomous agent", or needs guidance on agent structure, system prompts, triggering conditions, or agent development best practices for Claude Code plugins. |
Agent Development for Claude Code Plugins
Overview
Agents are autonomous subprocesses that handle complex, multi-step tasks independently. Master agent structure, triggering conditions, and system prompt design to create powerful autonomous capabilities.
Key concepts:
- Agents are FOR autonomous work, commands are FOR user-initiated actions
- Markdown file format with YAML frontmatter
- Triggering via description field with examples
- System prompt defines agent behavior
- Model and color customization
Important - Field Name Difference: Agents use
toolsto restrict tool access. Skills useallowed-toolsfor the same purpose. Don't confuse these when switching between component types.Note on Official Documentation: The
colorfield documented in this skill is supported by Claude Code and is generated by the built-in/agentscommand, but it is not yet reflected in the official sub-agents documentation. See anthropics/claude-code#8501 for tracking. The plugins-reference.md may show an older agent format using acapabilitiesfield; for Claude Code plugins, prefer the structure documented in this skill which usestoolsfor tool restrictions.
Quick Start
Minimal working agent (copy-paste ready):
---
name: my-reviewer
description: Use this agent when the user asks to review code. Examples:
<example>
Context: User wrote new code
user: "Review my changes"
assistant: "I'll use the my-reviewer agent to analyze the code."
<commentary>
Code review request triggers the agent.
</commentary>
</example>
model: inherit
color: blue
---
You are a code reviewer. Analyze code for issues and provide feedback.
**Process:**
1. Read the code
2. Identify issues
3. Provide recommendations
**Output:** Summary with file:line references for each finding.
For complete format with all options, see Agent File Structure.
When to Use Agents vs Commands vs Skills
| Component | Best For | Triggering | Example Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agents | Autonomous multi-step tasks | Proactive or description-matched | Code review after implementation |
| Commands | User-initiated actions | Explicit /command invocation |
/deploy production |
| Skills | Knowledge and guidance | Model-invoked based on context | Domain expertise for PDF processing |
See also: For command development, load the
command-developmentskill. For skill development, load theskill-developmentskill.
Choose Agents When
- Task requires autonomous, multi-step execution
- Proactive triggering after certain events is desired
- Specialized subprocess with focused tools needed
- Work should happen in the background or as a subagent
Choose Commands When
- User should explicitly trigger the action
- Task has clear start/end with specific inputs
- Action should not happen automatically
- Workflow requires user confirmation at each step
For command development guidance, see the command-development skill.
Choose Skills When
- Providing knowledge or procedural guidance
- Extending Claude's domain expertise
- No autonomous execution needed
- Information should be available contextually on-demand
For skill development guidance, see the skill-development skill.
Agent File Structure
Complete Format
---
name: agent-identifier
description: Use this agent when [triggering conditions]. Examples:
<example>
Context: [Situation description]
user: "[User request]"
assistant: "[How assistant should respond and use this agent]"
<commentary>
[Why this agent should be triggered]
</commentary>
</example>
<example>
[Additional example...]
</example>
model: inherit
color: blue
tools: Read, Write, Grep
---
You are [agent role description]...
**Your Core Responsibilities:**
1. [Responsibility 1]
2. [Responsibility 2]
**Analysis Process:**
[Step-by-step workflow]
**Output Format:**
[What to return]
Frontmatter Fields
name (required)
Agent identifier used for namespacing and invocation.
Format: lowercase, numbers, hyphens only Length: 3-50 characters Pattern: Must start and end with alphanumeric
Good examples:
code-reviewertest-generatorapi-docs-writersecurity-analyzer
Bad examples:
helper(too generic)-agent-(starts/ends with hyphen)my_agent(underscores not allowed)ag(too short, < 3 chars)
description (required)
Defines when Claude should trigger this agent. This is the most critical field.
Must include:
- Triggering conditions ("Use this agent when...")
- Multiple
<example>blocks showing usage - Context, user request, and assistant response in each example
<commentary>explaining why agent triggers
Format:
Use this agent when [conditions]. Examples:
<example>
Context: [Scenario description]
user: "[What user says]"
assistant: "[How Claude should respond]"
<commentary>
[Why this agent is appropriate]
</commentary>
</example>
[More examples...]
Best practices:
- Include 2-4 concrete examples
- Show proactive and reactive triggering
- Cover different phrasings of same intent
- Explain reasoning in commentary
- Be specific about when NOT to use the agent
model (required)
Which model the agent should use.
Options:
inherit- Use same model as parent (recommended)sonnet- Claude Sonnet (balanced)opus- Claude Opus (most capable, expensive)haiku- Claude Haiku (fast, cheap)
When to choose:
haiku- Fast, simple tasks; quick analysis; cost-sensitive operationssonnet- Balanced performance; most use cases (default recommendation)opus- Complex reasoning; detailed analysis; highest capability needed
Recommendation: Use inherit (recommended default) unless the agent specifically needs:
haikufor fast, cost-sensitive operationsopusfor complex reasoning requiring maximum capability
color (required)
Visual identifier for agent in UI.
Note: This field is supported by Claude Code but not yet in official documentation. See the Overview note for details.
Options: blue, cyan, green, yellow, magenta, red
Guidelines:
- Choose distinct colors for different agents in same plugin
- Use consistent colors for similar agent types
- Blue/cyan: Analysis, review
- Green: Success-oriented tasks
- Yellow: Caution, validation
- Red: Critical, security
- Magenta: Creative, generation
tools (optional)
Restrict agent to specific tools.
Format: Comma-separated tool names
tools: Read, Write, Grep, Bash
Default: If omitted, agent has access to all tools
Best practice: Limit tools to minimum needed (principle of least privilege)
Common tool sets:
- Read-only analysis:
Read, Grep, Glob - Code generation:
Read, Write, Grep - Testing:
Read, Bash, Grep - Full access: Omit field entirely
Important: Agents use
toolswhile Skills useallowed-tools. The field names differ between component types. For skill tool restrictions, see theskill-developmentskill.
System Prompt Design
The markdown body becomes the agent's system prompt. Write in second person, addressing the agent directly.
Structure
Standard template:
You are [role] specializing in [domain].
**Your Core Responsibilities:**
1. [Primary responsibility]
2. [Secondary responsibility]
3. [Additional responsibilities...]
**Analysis Process:**
1. [Step one]
2. [Step two]
3. [Step three]
[...]
**Quality Standards:**
- [Standard 1]
- [Standard 2]
**Output Format:**
Provide results in this format:
- [What to include]
- [How to structure]
**Edge Cases:**
Handle these situations:
- [Edge case 1]: [How to handle]
- [Edge case 2]: [How to handle]
Best Practices
✅ DO:
- Write in second person ("You are...", "You will...")
- Be specific about responsibilities
- Provide step-by-step process
- Define output format
- Include quality standards
- Address edge cases
- Keep under 10,000 characters
❌ DON'T:
- Write in first person ("I am...", "I will...")
- Be vague or generic
- Omit process steps
- Leave output format undefined
- Skip quality guidance
- Ignore error cases
Creating Agents
Method 1: AI-Assisted Generation
Use this prompt pattern (extracted from Claude Code):
Create an agent configuration based on this request: "[YOUR DESCRIPTION]"
Requirements:
1. Extract core intent and responsibilities
2. Design expert persona for the domain
3. Create comprehensive system prompt with:
- Clear behavioral boundaries
- Specific methodologies
- Edge case handling
- Output format
4. Create identifier (lowercase, hyphens, 3-50 chars)
5. Write description with triggering conditions
6. Include 2-3 <example> blocks showing when to use
Return JSON with:
{
"identifier": "agent-name",
"whenToUse": "Use this agent when... Examples: <example>...</example>",
"systemPrompt": "You are..."
}
Then convert to agent file format with frontmatter.
See examples/agent-creation-prompt.md for complete template.
Method 2: Manual Creation
- Choose agent identifier (3-50 chars, lowercase, hyphens)
- Write description with examples
- Select model (usually
inherit) - Choose color for visual identification
- Define tools (if restricting access)
- Write system prompt with structure above
- Save as
agents/agent-name.md
Validation Rules
Identifier Validation
✅ Valid: code-reviewer, test-gen, api-analyzer-v2
❌ Invalid: ag (too short), -start (starts with hyphen), my_agent (underscore)
Rules:
- 3-50 characters
- Lowercase letters, numbers, hyphens only
- Must start and end with alphanumeric
- No underscores, spaces, or special characters
Description Validation
Length: 10-5,000 characters Must include: Triggering conditions and examples Best: 200-1,000 characters with 2-4 examples
System Prompt Validation
Length: 20-10,000 characters Best: 500-3,000 characters Structure: Clear responsibilities, process, output format
Agent Organization
Plugin Agents Directory
plugin-name/
└── agents/
├── analyzer.md
├── reviewer.md
└── generator.md
All .md files in agents/ are auto-discovered.
Namespacing
Agents are namespaced automatically:
- Single plugin:
agent-name - With subdirectories:
plugin:subdir:agent-name
Testing Agents
Test Triggering
Create test scenarios to verify agent triggers correctly:
- Write agent with specific triggering examples
- Use similar phrasing to examples in test
- Check Claude loads the agent
- Verify agent provides expected functionality
Test System Prompt
Ensure system prompt is complete:
- Give agent typical task
- Check it follows process steps
- Verify output format is correct
- Test edge cases mentioned in prompt
- Confirm quality standards are met
Quick Reference
Minimal Agent
---
name: simple-agent
description: Use this agent when... Examples: <example>...</example>
model: inherit
color: blue
---
You are an agent that [does X].
Process:
1. [Step 1]
2. [Step 2]
Output: [What to provide]
Frontmatter Fields Summary
| Field | Required | Format | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | lowercase-hyphens | code-reviewer |
| description | Yes | Text + examples | Use when... |
| model | Yes | inherit/sonnet/opus/haiku | inherit |
| color | Yes | Color name | blue |
| tools | No | Comma-separated tool names | Read, Grep |
Note: Agents use
toolsto restrict tool access. Skills useallowed-toolsfor the same purpose. The field names differ between component types.
Best Practices
DO:
- ✅ Include 2-4 concrete examples in description
- ✅ Write specific triggering conditions
- ✅ Use
inheritfor model unless specific need - ✅ Choose appropriate tools (least privilege)
- ✅ Write clear, structured system prompts
- ✅ Test agent triggering thoroughly
DON'T:
- ❌ Use generic descriptions without examples
- ❌ Omit triggering conditions
- ❌ Give all agents same color
- ❌ Grant unnecessary tool access
- ❌ Write vague system prompts
- ❌ Skip testing
Additional Resources
Reference Files
For detailed guidance, consult:
references/system-prompt-design.md- Four system prompt patterns (Analysis, Generation, Validation, Orchestration) with complete templates and common pitfallsreferences/triggering-examples.md- Example block anatomy, four example types, template library, and debugging guidereferences/agent-creation-system-prompt.md- The exact prompt used by Claude Code's agent generation feature with usage patterns
Example Files
Working examples in examples/:
agent-creation-prompt.md- AI-assisted agent generation templatecomplete-agent-examples.md- Full agent examples for different use cases
Utility Scripts
Development tools in scripts/:
create-agent-skeleton.sh- Generate new agent file from templatevalidate-agent.sh- Validate agent file structuretest-agent-trigger.sh- Test if agent triggers correctly
Implementation Workflow
To create an agent for a plugin:
- Define agent purpose and triggering conditions
- Choose creation method (AI-assisted or manual)
- Create agent file using skeleton:
./skills/agent-development/scripts/create-agent-skeleton.sh agent-name agents/ - Write frontmatter with all required fields
- Write system prompt following best practices
- Include 2-4 triggering examples in description
- Validate with
./skills/agent-development/scripts/validate-agent.sh agents/your-agent.md - Test triggering with real scenarios
- Document agent in plugin README
Focus on clear triggering conditions and comprehensive system prompts for autonomous operation.