| name | scpr-framework |
| description | SCPR (Situation-Complication-Problem-Recommendation) framework for structured problem solving and executive communication. Use when users need to structure strategic arguments, analyze business situations, create executive summaries, or develop clear problem statements using McKinsey-style communication. Apply when structuring recommendations, writing memos, or organizing strategic thinking. |
SCPR Framework
A structured approach to problem-solving and executive communication used in management consulting.
Framework Components
S - Situation: Current state of the market/business
- What is the lay of the land?
- Establish baseline context
- Describe the stable environment before changes
C - Complication: Recent shift or change
- What has changed recently?
- New market dynamics (AI boom, regulatory changes, competitive threats)
- The catalyst that creates urgency
P - Problem: Crisp question to solve
- What specific strategic question must be answered?
- Common examples: "How to grow revenue?", "How to enter new market?", "How to reduce costs?"
- Must be specific and answerable
R - Recommendation: Proposed actions
- What should be done and by when?
- Priority actions to address the problem
- Can be structured as issue tree branches (doesn't have to be only high-priority items)
- Specific, actionable, time-bound
Core Principles
MECE (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive)
- Recommendations should not overlap
- Together they should cover all necessary actions
- Each recommendation addresses distinct aspect of the problem
Clarity
- Each section should be concise
- Problem statement must be answerable
- Recommendations must be actionable
Example: Tech Startup Product Pivot
Situation Series B SaaS startup with $15M ARR selling project management software to creative agencies and marketing firms. Product focuses on task management, resource allocation, and client collaboration. 200 agency customers with average contract size $75K. Historically strong product-market fit with 25% YoY growth and 90% gross retention.
Complication AI-powered tools like ChatGPT, Notion AI, and Claude emerging as workflow automation alternatives. Customer usage metrics declining 15% over last 6 months. Exit interviews reveal agencies using AI for project briefs, status updates, and resource planning - core features of current product. Three enterprise deals ($500K pipeline) paused citing "evaluating AI-first solutions."
Problem How should we reposition the product and business model to return to 25%+ growth within 12 months while competing against general-purpose AI tools?
Recommendations
Product: Launch AI-native workflow engine by Q2 2025
- Integrate LLM for automated project scoping and task breakdown
- AI-powered resource matching based on skills and availability
- Differentiate on agency-specific context (brand guidelines, client history, creative workflows)
Positioning: Shift from "project management" to "AI-augmented agency operations" by Q1 2025
- Rebrand messaging around AI that understands agency workflows
- Emphasize integration advantages over general tools
- Target gap: ChatGPT lacks agency-specific memory and processes
Pricing: Introduce usage-based AI tier by Q2 2025
- Base platform remains flat fee ($75K)
- AI features charged per automation/generation
- Capture value from high-usage customers, protect downside
Usage Patterns
When creating SCPR structure:
- Start with Situation (establish baseline)
- Identify Complication (what changed?)
- Frame Problem as specific question
- Develop MECE Recommendations with timeline
When analyzing existing content:
- Extract facts into S/C/P/R categories
- Test Problem for specificity
- Verify Recommendations are MECE
- Add timelines if missing
When reviewing SCPR:
- Is Situation necessary context only (not exhaustive)?
- Is Complication recent and urgent?
- Is Problem answerable and specific?
- Are Recommendations mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive?
- Does each Recommendation include "by when"?
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Situation too detailed: Keep to essential context only
- Complication = Problem: They're different. Complication is "what changed", Problem is "what question to solve"
- Vague Problem: "Improve business" is too broad. "Increase revenue 40% in 12 months" is specific
- Overlapping Recommendations: Ensure MECE structure
- No timelines: Always include "by when" in Recommendations