| name | Eval Analyzer |
| description | Analyze evaluation baseline results, identify failure patterns, and generate actionable insights. Use after running eval baselines or when user asks to analyze eval results, check benchmarks, investigate failures, or understand what's failing. |
Eval Analyzer
Analyze AILANG evaluation baseline results to identify failure patterns, compare model performance, and generate actionable insights.
Quick Start
Most common usage:
# User says: "Analyze the v0.3.24 eval results"
# This skill will:
# 1. Run eval-analyze to categorize failures (standard eval)
# 2. Run agent KPIs to analyze efficiency (agent eval)
# 3. Generate summary with jq queries
# 4. Identify top failing benchmarks
# 5. Show model performance comparison
# 6. Provide optimization recommendations
For agent evaluation analysis (NEW - optimization focus):
# Step 1: Get efficiency metrics (turns, tokens, cost)
.claude/skills/eval-analyzer/scripts/agent_kpis.sh eval_results/baselines/v0.3.24
# Step 2: Investigate expensive benchmarks
.claude/skills/eval-analyzer/scripts/agent_transcripts.sh eval_results/baselines/v0.3.24 simple_print
# Step 3: Compare Python vs AILANG
./tools/compare_agents.sh eval_results/baselines/v0.3.24
See `resources/agent_optimization_guide.md` for complete optimization strategies.
When to Use This Skill
Invoke this skill when:
- User asks to "analyze eval results", "check benchmarks", "what's failing"
- After running an eval baseline
- When investigating why benchmark performance changed
- User wants to understand failure patterns or model performance
- Comparing two versions of AILANG
Key Eval Commands
All commands work on baseline directories like eval_results/baselines/v0.3.16/.
1. Quick Overview - eval-matrix
Shows comprehensive statistics with model/language breakdowns.
ailang eval-matrix eval_results/baselines/v0.3.16 0.3.16 | head -60
Shows: Overall stats, per-model performance, per-language breakdown, top error codes.
2. Detailed Analysis - eval-analyze
Categorizes failures and can generate design docs for issues.
# Dry run (no design docs, just analysis)
ailang eval-analyze -results eval_results/baselines/v0.3.16 -dry-run
# Full analysis with design doc generation
ailang eval-analyze -results eval_results/baselines/v0.3.16
⚠️ CRITICAL: Must use -results flag, NOT positional argument!
Output: Categorized failures (compile_error, logic_error, runtime_error) with frequency, affected benchmarks, models, and sample errors.
3. Query-Friendly Summary - eval-summary
Generates JSONL for easy querying with jq.
ailang eval-summary eval_results/baselines/v0.3.16
Output: eval_results/baselines/v0.3.16/summary.jsonl
4. Compare Versions - eval-compare
Shows what changed between two versions.
ailang eval-compare eval_results/baselines/v0.3.15 eval_results/baselines/v0.3.16
5. Fair Comparison (RECOMMENDED) - fair_comparison.py
Use this for accurate version comparisons! The eval-compare command may include duplicates or different model sets. This script normalizes data for apple-to-apples comparison.
.claude/skills/eval-analyzer/scripts/fair_comparison.py
What it does:
- Deduplicates runs (keeps last run per benchmark+model)
- Filters to dev models only (gpt5-mini, claude-haiku-4-5, gemini-2-5-flash)
- AILANG only (ignores Python results)
- Shows net fixes vs regressions
- Per-model breakdown
Output:
v0.4.0: 56/123 = 45.5%
v0.4.2: 59/123 = 48.0%
Delta: +3 (+2.4pp)
✅ Fixed: 11 benchmarks
❌ Broken: 8 benchmarks
NET: +3 benchmarks
When to use: Before making decisions based on eval results (e.g., reverting changes, merging PRs).
6. Validate Results - validate_eval_results.py
Check for output corruption and race conditions in eval results.
python3 tools/validate_eval_results.py eval_results/baselines/v0.4.2
Checks:
- Output corruption (fibonacci outputting "All results equal", etc.)
- Duplicate runs for same benchmark+model
- Code hash validation (if available)
- Success rate statistics
When to use: After running eval baselines, especially if results look suspicious.
Agent Analysis Scripts (NEW!)
For agent-based evaluation results (Python vs AILANG comparisons with Claude Code):
1. Agent KPIs - Minimize Tokens & Turns
Shows efficiency metrics for agent runs - key for optimizing language and prompts.
.claude/skills/eval-analyzer/scripts/agent_kpis.sh eval_results/WITH_ALL_FIXES
Output:
- Average turns, tokens, cost by language (Python vs AILANG)
- Most expensive benchmarks (by turns) - candidates for optimization
- Most efficient benchmarks - learn from these
- Success rates and performance comparison
Goal: Minimize agent turns and tokens → indicates clearer prompts and simpler language.
2. Agent Transcripts - View AILANG Conversations
View full agent conversation logs to understand what happened.
# View all transcripts
.claude/skills/eval-analyzer/scripts/agent_transcripts.sh eval_results/WITH_ALL_FIXES
# View only failures
.claude/skills/eval-analyzer/scripts/agent_transcripts.sh eval_results/WITH_ALL_FIXES --failed-only
# View specific benchmark
.claude/skills/eval-analyzer/scripts/agent_transcripts.sh eval_results/WITH_ALL_FIXES fizzbuzz
Output:
- Turn-by-turn conversation showing agent's thought process
- Metrics: turns, tokens, duration
- Success/failure status with error category
- First 100 lines of transcript (with hint to view full)
Use for: Understanding why AILANG solutions fail or take many turns.
3. Python vs AILANG Comparison
Use the existing tools/compare_agents.sh script for side-by-side comparison:
./tools/compare_agents.sh eval_results/WITH_ALL_FIXES
Output:
- Side-by-side metrics table
- Solution code comparison
- Transcripts for failed solutions (automatic)
- Winner indicators for each metric
Standard Eval Workflow (Non-Agent)
Step 1: Get High-Level Overview
# Show overall statistics
ailang eval-matrix eval_results/baselines/v0.3.16 0.3.16 | head -60
Look for:
- Overall success rate (target: >60%)
- AILANG vs Python gap (current: ~54%)
- Model performance variance
- Top error codes
Step 2: Identify Problem Areas
# Categorize all failures
ailang eval-analyze -results eval_results/baselines/v0.3.16 -dry-run
Key metrics:
- compile_error frequency (parse/syntax issues)
- logic_error frequency (wrong output)
- runtime_error frequency (crashes)
- Which benchmarks fail most
Step 3: Query with jq (Custom Analysis)
Use jq queries on summary.jsonl for custom analysis:
# Ensure summary exists
ailang eval-summary eval_results/baselines/v0.3.20
# AILANG-only success rate (all models)
jq -s 'map(select(.lang == "ailang")) |
{total: length, success: (map(select(.stdout_ok == true)) | length),
rate: ((map(select(.stdout_ok == true)) | length) * 100.0 / length)}' \
eval_results/baselines/v0.3.20/summary.jsonl
# Dev models only (useful for prompt testing)
jq -s 'map(select(.lang == "ailang" and
(.model == "gpt5-mini" or .model == "claude-haiku-4-5" or .model == "gemini-2-5-flash"))) |
{total: length, success: (map(select(.stdout_ok == true)) | length),
rate: ((map(select(.stdout_ok == true)) | length) * 100.0 / length)}' \
eval_results/baselines/v0.3.20/summary.jsonl
# Check specific benchmark across all models
jq -s 'map(select(.benchmark == "explicit_state_threading" and .lang == "ailang")) |
map({model, success: .stdout_ok, error: .error_category})' \
eval_results/baselines/v0.3.20/summary.jsonl
# Compare two versions (dev models AILANG-only)
jq -s 'map(select(.lang == "ailang" and
(.model == "gpt5-mini" or .model == "claude-haiku-4-5" or .model == "gemini-2-5-flash"))) |
{total: length, success: (map(select(.stdout_ok == true)) | length),
rate: ((map(select(.stdout_ok == true)) | length) * 100.0 / length)}' \
eval_results/baselines/v0.3.20/summary.jsonl \
eval_results/baselines/v0.3.21/summary.jsonl
For more jq patterns, see `resources/jq_queries.md`
Step 4: Deep Dive with Helper Scripts
Use the provided helper scripts for detailed code inspection:
# Failure analysis with error categorization
.claude/skills/eval-analyzer/scripts/analyze_failures.sh eval_results/baselines/v0.3.16
# Model performance comparison
.claude/skills/eval-analyzer/scripts/compare_models.sh eval_results/baselines/v0.3.16
# Examine specific benchmark failures
.claude/skills/eval-analyzer/scripts/examine_code.sh eval_results/baselines/v0.3.16 api_call_json
Step 4: Compare with Previous Version
# Show regressions and improvements
ailang eval-compare eval_results/baselines/v0.3.15 eval_results/baselines/v0.3.16
Step 5: Generate Insights
Based on the data, identify:
- Systemic Issues: Categories with >50 failures
- Model Patterns: Which models struggle with which features
- Benchmark Hotspots: Benchmarks with 100% failure rate
- Cost Efficiency: Which models give best success/cost ratio
- Trends: Improvements or regressions vs previous version
Key Metrics to Track
- Overall Success Rate: AILANG vs Python gap (target: reduce below 50%)
- Error Code Distribution:
- PAR_001 (parse errors) - indicates prompt/syntax issues
- WRONG_LANG - models writing Python instead of AILANG
- IMPERATIVE - models using imperative patterns
- Model Performance: Which models work best with AILANG
- Benchmark-Level: Which benchmarks consistently fail
- Cost Efficiency: Success rate per dollar spent
- Repair Success: Is self-repair helping? (currently low)
Common Issues
Issue 1: "Total Runs: 6" instead of 408
Symptom: eval-analyze only finds 6 results
Cause: Used positional argument instead of -results flag
Solution:
# ❌ WRONG
ailang eval-analyze eval_results/baselines/v0.3.16
# ✅ CORRECT
ailang eval-analyze -results eval_results/baselines/v0.3.16
Issue 2: Summary file not found
Symptom: jq queries fail with "file not found"
Cause: Need to run eval-summary first
Solution:
ailang eval-summary eval_results/baselines/v0.3.16
Issue 3: Design docs not generated
Symptom: eval-analyze shows issues but doesn't create docs
Cause: Using -dry-run flag
Solution: Run without -dry-run to generate design docs
Helper Scripts
The skill includes helper scripts in scripts/ directory:
quick_summary.sh
Fast overview using eval-matrix.
.claude/skills/eval-analyzer/scripts/quick_summary.sh eval_results/baselines/v0.3.16
Output: Overall stats, model performance, language breakdown, top error codes.
analyze_failures.sh
Detailed failure analysis with error categorization.
.claude/skills/eval-analyzer/scripts/analyze_failures.sh eval_results/baselines/v0.3.16 ailang
Output: Overall statistics, error categories, top failing benchmarks, model performance, error codes.
compare_models.sh
Model-by-model performance comparison.
.claude/skills/eval-analyzer/scripts/compare_models.sh eval_results/baselines/v0.3.16
Output: Success rates, first-attempt vs final, cost analysis, token usage, best model per benchmark.
examine_code.sh
Inspect generated code from specific benchmarks.
.claude/skills/eval-analyzer/scripts/examine_code.sh eval_results/baselines/v0.3.16 api_call_json
.claude/skills/eval-analyzer/scripts/examine_code.sh eval_results/baselines/v0.3.16 api_call_json gpt5
Output: Generated code, compiler errors, success status, error codes for each model run.
examine_prompts.sh
View prompts used for specific benchmarks.
.claude/skills/eval-analyzer/scripts/examine_prompts.sh eval_results/baselines/v0.3.16 api_call_json
Output: System prompt, user prompt, success status for benchmark runs.
verify_prompt_accuracy.sh
Check if prompt documentation matches actual implementation.
.claude/skills/eval-analyzer/scripts/verify_prompt_accuracy.sh v0.3.16
Output: Reports false limitations, undocumented features, and prompt-code mismatches.
Use this: After creating new prompt versions to catch documentation bugs!
Resources
Analysis Documents
- `resources/failure_analysis_v0.3.16.md` - Comprehensive analysis of v0.3.16 eval results with root cause analysis
Common jq Patterns
See `resources/jq_queries.md` for more query examples and patterns.
Progressive Disclosure
This skill loads information progressively:
- Always loaded: This SKILL.md file (workflow + commands + scripts)
- Execute as needed:
ailang eval-*commands and helper scripts - Load on demand:
resources/jq_queries.md, analysis documents
Notes
- All eval commands work offline (no API calls for analysis)
eval-analyzegenerates design docs using LLM (default: gpt5)- Summary JSONL format is stable and queryable
- Use
-dry-runto preview before generating design docs - baseline directories typically at
eval_results/baselines/vX.X.X/ - This skill complements
post-releaseskill (which runs baselines)