| name | data-storytelling |
| description | Transform raw data into compelling narratives that drive decisions. Use when creating executive presentations, board decks, investor pitches, quarterly reviews, stakeholder reports, or any communication where data must persuade. Activates for phrases like "tell a story with this data", "make this compelling", "present findings", or "executive summary". |
Data Storytelling
Transform data into narratives that move people to action.
The Quality Standard
Your output will be judged by executives who see dozens of data presentations weekly. They will compare your work to McKinsey decks, Stripe's investor updates, and the best TED data talks.
The bar: A CFO should forward your output to their board without edits. An investor should feel informed AND compelled. A skeptic should find their objections already addressed.
If your output looks like "analyst work" rather than "partner work", revise before presenting.
Anti-Patterns: What Bad Data Stories Look Like
Before creating anything, understand what to avoid:
BAD: The Data Dump
Q3 Results:
- Revenue: $4.2M
- Users: 12,450
- Churn: 3.2%
- NPS: 42
- CAC: $156
- LTV: $890
Why it fails: No hierarchy, no insight, no action. Reader must do all interpretation.
BAD: The Buried Lead
We analyzed 45,000 customer interactions across 6 channels over 18 months.
Our methodology involved sentiment analysis using BERT-based models...
[3 paragraphs of methodology]
...which revealed that response time is the #1 driver of churn.
Why it fails: Insight buried under process. Executives stopped reading at paragraph 2.
BAD: The Hedge Festival
The data seems to suggest that there might be a correlation between
pricing and retention, although further analysis would be needed to
confirm this preliminary observation with statistical significance.
Why it fails: No conviction. If you're not sure, why should they be?
BAD: The Vanity Parade
Great news! We hit 1M page views this month!
Engagement is up 40%! Users love us!
Why it fails: No context (up from what?), no connection to business outcomes, celebrates metrics that don't matter.
The Three Story Structures
Choose ONE structure based on your situation:
Structure 1: Problem → Cause → Solution
Use when: Something is broken and you have a fix
HOOK: "We're losing $2.3M annually to preventable churn."
PROBLEM: Show the pain with ONE compelling metric
[Chart: Churn trend with $ impact overlay]
CAUSE: Reveal the root cause with evidence
"Customers who wait >4 hours for support are 3.2x more likely to cancel"
[Chart: Response time vs. churn correlation]
SOLUTION: Propose specific action with projected impact
"Hiring 3 support agents = $890K cost, $1.8M churn reduction = $910K net gain"
CALL: "Approve headcount by Friday to capture Q4 retention window"
Structure 2: Before → Change → After
Use when: Demonstrating transformation or progress
HOOK: "Six months ago, we couldn't answer basic customer questions."
BEFORE: Establish the painful baseline
"Average resolution: 6.2 days. CSAT: 34."
[Chart: Old state metrics]
CHANGE: Show what you did (briefly - this is not the star)
"Implemented AI triage + specialist routing"
AFTER: Celebrate the outcome with proof
"Resolution: 4.1 hours. CSAT: 78. Support costs -40%."
[Chart: New state with improvement callouts]
CALL: "Expand this model to sales and onboarding by Q2"
Structure 3: Option A vs. Option B vs. Option C
Use when: Requesting a decision between alternatives
HOOK: "We must choose our 2025 growth engine this quarter."
FRAME: Establish evaluation criteria (max 4)
"Judging by: ROI, time-to-impact, risk, strategic fit"
OPTIONS: Present each with honest tradeoffs
[Table: Options scored against criteria]
Option A: Highest ROI but 18-month horizon
Option B: Fastest impact but highest risk
Option C: Balanced profile, proven playbook
RECOMMEND: State your position with reasoning
"Recommend Option C. Here's why: [specific rationale]"
CALL: "Need decision by EOW to begin vendor negotiations"
The Headline Formula
Every data point needs a headline that combines:
[SPECIFIC NUMBER] + [DIRECTION] + [BUSINESS IMPACT] + [TIMEFRAME]
Weak Headlines (Don't Use)
- "Revenue Overview"
- "Q3 Metrics"
- "Customer Analysis"
- "Churn Rate Update"
Strong Headlines (Use These Patterns)
- "Revenue +23% YoY, beating forecast by $1.2M"
- "Churn cut in half: 6.1% → 2.9% since pricing change"
- "Enterprise pipeline 3x larger than same quarter last year"
- "Support costs -$420K despite 40% ticket volume increase"
The Test: If your headline could apply to a different company or quarter, it's too generic.
Visual Principles
The 3-Second Rule
A viewer should understand your chart's message in 3 seconds. If they need to study it, you've failed.
How to pass:
Title states the insight, not the topic
- NO: "Monthly Revenue"
- YES: "Revenue recovered to pre-COVID levels in August"
One focal point per visual
- Highlight THE number/trend that matters
- Grey out or remove everything else
Annotation on the chart itself
- Don't make readers cross-reference legends
- Arrow + label pointing to the key moment
Chart Selection (The Only 4 You Need)
| Message | Chart Type | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Change over time | Line | Revenue trajectory |
| Part of whole | Stacked bar or pie (≤5 segments) | Revenue by segment |
| Comparison | Horizontal bar | Feature adoption rates |
| Correlation | Scatter | Price vs. conversion |
Banned: 3D charts, dual-axis charts (almost always confusing), pie charts with >5 segments.
Color Rules
GREEN = Good / Target met / Growth
RED = Bad / Below target / Decline
GREY = Context / Comparison baseline
BRAND = Your company's accent color for "us"
Never use color for decoration. Every color choice should carry meaning.
Handling Uncertainty Honestly
Executives respect honesty about limitations. Here's how:
State Confidence Levels
HIGH CONFIDENCE: "Churn will decrease 15-20% based on 3 prior tests"
MEDIUM: "Early signals suggest 10-15% improvement; need 60 more days"
HYPOTHESIS: "We believe X causes Y. Proposed test to validate."
Present Ranges, Not False Precision
BAD: "Projected revenue: $4,237,891"
GOOD: "Projected revenue: $4.0-4.5M (80% confidence)"
Acknowledge What You Don't Know
"This analysis covers digital channels. Retail data arrives next week
and may shift conclusions."
The paradox: Acknowledging uncertainty increases credibility, not decreases it.
The Delivery Checklist
Before presenting, verify:
STRUCTURE
[ ] Opened with the most important insight (not methodology)
[ ] Used exactly ONE of the three story structures
[ ] Every section drives toward the call-to-action
[ ] Conclusion includes specific ask with deadline
HEADLINES
[ ] Every chart has an insight headline (not topic label)
[ ] Headlines could not apply to a different dataset
[ ] Numbers include context (vs. prior period, vs. target)
VISUALS
[ ] Each chart passes the 3-second test
[ ] Color has meaning, not decoration
[ ] No 3D, no dual-axis, no pie charts >5 segments
[ ] Annotations are ON the chart, not in footnotes
EVIDENCE
[ ] Claims are supported by data shown
[ ] Uncertainty is acknowledged where present
[ ] Methodology available but not leading
[ ] Sources cited for external data
QUALITY
[ ] Would a McKinsey partner present this unedited?
[ ] Does it respect the audience's time?
[ ] Is every element earning its space?
[ ] Have I killed my darlings? (removed pet analyses that don't serve the story)
Example: Full Data Story
Context: Presenting Q3 results to the board
Slide 1: The Hook
"Q3 Net Revenue Retention hit 112% — our best quarter ever"
[Single large number: 112%, with arrow showing +8pp vs Q2]
We'll cover: what drove this, risks ahead, and what we need to sustain it.
Slide 2: The Trend
"NRR has improved for 4 consecutive quarters after pricing restructure"
[Line chart: NRR by quarter, with Feb pricing change annotated]
Grey zone shows "danger zone" (<100%). Annotation: "Pricing change here →"
Slide 3: The Driver
"Expansion revenue from existing customers now exceeds new sales"
[Stacked bar: New ARR vs Expansion ARR by quarter]
Key callout: "Expansion = 54% of Q3 growth"
Slide 4: The Risk
"Enterprise segment is strong; SMB churn remains elevated"
[Side-by-side bars: Enterprise NRR (124%) vs SMB NRR (89%)]
"SMB represents 35% of revenue. Fixing this is our biggest opportunity."
Slide 5: The Ask
"Approve SMB retention initiative: $400K investment for projected $1.2M ARR save"
[Simple ROI table: Cost vs. projected benefit with payback period]
Decision needed by Oct 15 to impact Q4 renewals.
When to Use This Skill
This skill activates when you need to:
- Present data to executives, boards, or investors
- Create quarterly business reviews
- Build pitch decks with data support
- Write stakeholder updates that require action
- Transform analysis into persuasive narrative
- Make complex data accessible to non-technical audiences
Resources
Reference quality examples:
- Stripe's Annual Letter - Master class in data narrative
- [a](Mary Meeker's Internet Trends - Visual density done right
- Our World in Data - Clarity at scale
Underlying principles:
- Cole Nussbaumer Knaflic, Storytelling with Data
- Edward Tufte, The Visual Display of Quantitative Information
- Nancy Duarte, Resonate