Claude Code Plugins

Community-maintained marketplace

Feedback

docker-dotnet-containerize

@thapaliyabikendra/ai-artifacts
0
0

Generate production-ready Docker configurations for .NET APIs with multi-stage builds, Alpine optimization, layer caching, and build scripts. Use when containerizing .NET applications, creating Dockerfiles, or optimizing existing Docker setups.

Install Skill

1Download skill
2Enable skills in Claude

Open claude.ai/settings/capabilities and find the "Skills" section

3Upload to Claude

Click "Upload skill" and select the downloaded ZIP file

Note: Please verify skill by going through its instructions before using it.

SKILL.md

name docker-dotnet-containerize
description Generate production-ready Docker configurations for .NET APIs with multi-stage builds, Alpine optimization, layer caching, and build scripts. Use when containerizing .NET applications, creating Dockerfiles, or optimizing existing Docker setups.
layer 1
tech_stack docker, dotnet
topics dockerfile, multi-stage, alpine, layer-caching, docker-compose, optimization
depends_on
complements
keywords Dockerfile, docker-compose, FROM, COPY, RUN, ENTRYPOINT, Alpine, multi-stage

.NET Docker Containerization Skill

Generate optimized Docker configurations for .NET projects using advanced build techniques, progressive layer publishing, and production-ready multi-stage builds.

What This Skill Does

I will analyze your .NET solution and generate:

  1. Optimized Dockerfile with BuildKit features and layer caching
  2. Build scripts (Bash/PowerShell) with version tagging
  3. .dockerignore file with comprehensive patterns
  4. Validation checklist and troubleshooting guidance

Advanced Techniques Applied

BuildKit Frontend (syntax=docker/dockerfile:1-labs)

I use the experimental BuildKit frontend for:

  • --parents flag support (preserves directory structure)
  • Better caching mechanisms
  • Advanced COPY operations
  • Improved build performance

Progressive Layer Publishing

For complex projects, I publish in dependency order:

  1. Domain layer → Publish first (most stable)
  2. Infrastructure/EF Core → Publish second
  3. Application/HttpApi → Publish third
  4. API Host → Publish last (changes most)

Why? This creates separate layers in /app/publish, optimizing Docker layer caching. When you change only the API code, earlier layers remain cached.

Non-Alpine SDK with Alpine Runtime

  • Build stage: Uses full SDK (not Alpine) for better compatibility
  • Runtime stage: Uses Alpine for minimal footprint
  • Benefit: Avoid Alpine SDK build issues while keeping final image small

Project Analysis

Detection Process

I'll examine:

  • Solution file (*.sln) location and structure
  • All project files (*.csproj) and their dependencies
  • Main entry point (typically *.Host, *.Api, *.HttpApi.Host)
  • .NET version from <TargetFramework> tags
  • Existence of common.props (ABP Framework indicator)
  • Project architecture (Simple, DDD, ABP, Clean Architecture)

Dependency Graph Mapping

I'll build a dependency graph to determine:

  • Which projects reference which
  • Optimal layer ordering for caching
  • Whether progressive publishing is beneficial

Simple projects (≤3): Single publish step
Complex projects (≥4): Progressive multi-layer publishing

Dockerfile Generation

Standard Template Structure

# syntax=docker/dockerfile:1-labs
# BuildKit frontend for advanced features (--parents flag)

# Runtime base: Alpine for minimal size
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/aspnet:{VERSION}-alpine AS base
USER app
WORKDIR /app
EXPOSE 8080
EXPOSE 8081

# Build stage: Full SDK (not Alpine) for compatibility
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:{VERSION}-alpine AS publish
ARG BUILD_CONFIGURATION=Release
WORKDIR /src

# [Project-specific COPY and publish commands]

# Final runtime
FROM base AS final
WORKDIR /app
COPY --from=publish /app/publish .
ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "{MainAssembly}.dll"]

Pattern 1: Simple Projects (2-3 projects)

# syntax=docker/dockerfile:1-labs

FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/aspnet:9.0-alpine AS base
USER app
WORKDIR /app
EXPOSE 8080
EXPOSE 8081

FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:9.0-alpine AS publish
ARG BUILD_CONFIGURATION=Release
WORKDIR /src

# Copy project files with --parents (preserves structure)
COPY --parents src/MyProject.Models/MyProject.Models.csproj \
               src/MyProject.Api/MyProject.Api.csproj \
              /src/

# Restore dependencies (quiet mode)
RUN dotnet restore "./src/MyProject.Api/MyProject.Api.csproj" -v q

# Copy all source code
COPY --parents src/MyProject.Models/ \
               src/MyProject.Api/ \
              /src/

# Single publish step
RUN dotnet publish "src/MyProject.Api/MyProject.Api.csproj" \
    -c $BUILD_CONFIGURATION \
    -o /app/publish \
    /p:UseAppHost=false \
    -v q

FROM base AS final
WORKDIR /app
COPY --from=publish /app/publish .
ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "MyProject.Api.dll"]

Pattern 2: ABP Framework / Complex DDD (7+ projects)

# syntax=docker/dockerfile:1-labs

FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/aspnet:8.0-alpine AS base
USER app
WORKDIR /app
EXPOSE 8080
EXPOSE 8081

FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:8.0-alpine AS publish
ARG BUILD_CONFIGURATION=Release
WORKDIR /src

# Copy solution-level configuration (ABP Framework)
COPY common.props ./

# Layer 1: Copy all project files for restore
COPY --parents src/Project.Domain.Shared/Project.Domain.Shared.csproj \
               src/Project.Domain/Project.Domain.csproj \
               src/Project.EntityFrameworkCore/Project.EntityFrameworkCore.csproj \
               src/Project.Application.Contracts/Project.Application.Contracts.csproj \
               src/Project.HttpApi/Project.HttpApi.csproj \
               src/Project.Application/Project.Application.csproj \
               src/Project.HttpApi.Host/Project.HttpApi.Host.csproj \
              /src/

# Restore from entry point (restores all dependencies)
RUN dotnet restore "./src/Project.HttpApi.Host/Project.HttpApi.Host.csproj" -v q

# Layer 2: Publish Domain + EF Core (most stable, changes least)
COPY --parents src/Project.Domain.Shared/ \
               src/Project.Domain/ \
               src/Project.EntityFrameworkCore/ \
              /src/

RUN dotnet publish "src/Project.EntityFrameworkCore/Project.EntityFrameworkCore.csproj" \
    -c $BUILD_CONFIGURATION \
    -o /app/publish \
    /p:UseAppHost=false \
    -v q

# Layer 3: Publish Application.Contracts + HttpApi
COPY --parents src/Project.Application.Contracts/ \
               src/Project.HttpApi/ \
              /src/

RUN dotnet publish "src/Project.HttpApi/Project.HttpApi.csproj" \
    -c $BUILD_CONFIGURATION \
    -o /app/publish \
    /p:UseAppHost=false \
    -v q

# Layer 4: Publish Application + Host (changes most often)
COPY --parents src/Project.Application/ \
               src/Project.HttpApi.Host/ \
              /src/

RUN dotnet publish "src/Project.HttpApi.Host/Project.HttpApi.Host.csproj" \
    -c $BUILD_CONFIGURATION \
    -o /app/publish \
    /p:UseAppHost=false \
    -v q

FROM base AS final
WORKDIR /app
COPY --from=publish /app/publish .
ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "Project.HttpApi.Host.dll"]

Key Optimization Techniques

1. --parents Flag (BuildKit)

# Preserves directory structure automatically
COPY --parents src/Domain/Domain.csproj /src/
# Result: /src/src/Domain/Domain.csproj (structure maintained)

Why? No need to manually match paths. Works with relative references in .csproj files.

2. Progressive Publishing Strategy

Traditional approach (single publish):

RUN dotnet publish "Host.csproj" -o /app/publish

❌ Changes to Host trigger rebuild of entire application

Progressive approach (layered publishing):

# Publish Domain (layer 1)
RUN dotnet publish "Domain.csproj" -o /app/publish

# Publish Infrastructure (layer 2)  
RUN dotnet publish "Infrastructure.csproj" -o /app/publish

# Publish Application (layer 3)
RUN dotnet publish "Application.csproj" -o /app/publish

# Publish Host (layer 4)
RUN dotnet publish "Host.csproj" -o /app/publish

✅ Changes to Host only rebuild layer 4, cache layers 1-3

3. Quiet Mode Builds (-v q)

RUN dotnet restore "./Project.csproj" -v q
RUN dotnet publish "Project.csproj" -v q

Why? Cleaner build logs, easier to spot errors, less noise in CI/CD.

4. Alpine Runtime with Full SDK

# Build: Full SDK for better compatibility
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:9.0-alpine AS publish

# Runtime: Alpine for minimal size
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/aspnet:9.0-alpine AS base

Why? Alpine SDK can have issues with certain NuGet packages. Full SDK works better, Alpine runtime keeps final image small.

5. Build Configuration as ARG

ARG BUILD_CONFIGURATION=Release
RUN dotnet publish -c $BUILD_CONFIGURATION

Why? Allows docker build --build-arg BUILD_CONFIGURATION=Debug for testing.

Build Script Generation

Bash Script (build.sh)

#!/bin/bash
# Build script for .NET Docker image with version tagging

if [ -z "$1" ]; then
    echo "************************************************"
    echo ""
    echo "Usage: ./build.sh <version>"
    echo "Example: ./build.sh 1.0.0"
    echo ""
    echo "************************************************"
    exit 1
fi

VERSION=$1
IMAGE_NAME="mycompany/myproject"
DOCKERFILE_PATH="./Dockerfile"

echo "Building Docker image: ${IMAGE_NAME}:${VERSION}"

docker build \
    -f ${DOCKERFILE_PATH} \
    -t ${IMAGE_NAME}:${VERSION} \
    -t ${IMAGE_NAME}:latest \
    --build-arg BUILD_CONFIGURATION=Release \
    .

if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
    echo ""
    echo "✅ Build successful!"
    echo "Image tagged as:"
    echo "  - ${IMAGE_NAME}:${VERSION}"
    echo "  - ${IMAGE_NAME}:latest"
    echo ""
    echo "To run: docker run -p 8080:8080 ${IMAGE_NAME}:${VERSION}"
else
    echo ""
    echo "❌ Build failed!"
    exit 1
fi

PowerShell Script (build.ps1)

# Build script for .NET Docker image with version tagging
param(
    [Parameter(Mandatory=$true)]
    [string]$Version
)

$ImageName = "mycompany/myproject"
$DockerfilePath = "./Dockerfile"

Write-Host "Building Docker image: ${ImageName}:${Version}" -ForegroundColor Cyan

docker build `
    -f $DockerfilePath `
    -t "${ImageName}:${Version}" `
    -t "${ImageName}:latest" `
    --build-arg BUILD_CONFIGURATION=Release `
    .

if ($LASTEXITCODE -eq 0) {
    Write-Host ""
    Write-Host "✅ Build successful!" -ForegroundColor Green
    Write-Host "Image tagged as:"
    Write-Host "  - ${ImageName}:${Version}"
    Write-Host "  - ${ImageName}:latest"
    Write-Host ""
    Write-Host "To run: docker run -p 8080:8080 ${ImageName}:${Version}"
} else {
    Write-Host ""
    Write-Host "❌ Build failed!" -ForegroundColor Red
    exit 1
}

.dockerignore Generation

# Build outputs
**/bin/
**/obj/
**/out/
**/publish/

# IDE and editor files
**/.vs/
**/.vscode/
**/.idea/
**/*.user
**/*.suo
**/*.swp
**/.DS_Store

# Test results and coverage
**/TestResults/
**/coverage/
**/*.trx

# Package directories
**/node_modules/
**/packages/
**/bower_components/

# Logs and temporary files
**/*.log
**/logs/
**/temp/
**/tmp/

# Version control
.git/
.gitignore
.gitattributes

# CI/CD
.github/
.gitlab-ci.yml
azure-pipelines.yml

# Documentation
*.md
!README.md
docs/
documentation/

# Docker files (avoid recursion)
**/Dockerfile*
**/docker-compose*
**/.dockerignore

# Development tools
**/.editorconfig
**/.prettierrc
**/.eslintrc*

Decision Logic for Dockerfile Patterns

When to Use Single Publish

Use for:

  • Projects with ≤3 .csproj files
  • Simple API + Models structure
  • Microservices with minimal dependencies
  • Fast build times (<30 seconds)

When to Use Progressive Publishing

Use for:

  • Projects with ≥4 .csproj files
  • ABP Framework projects
  • Clean Architecture / DDD projects
  • Long build times (>1 minute)
  • Frequent changes to outer layers (API/Host)

Progressive publishing trades:

  • Slightly more complex Dockerfile
  • For significantly faster rebuild times

Architecture-Specific Patterns

ABP Framework Detection

Indicators:

  • common.props file exists
  • Projects named with .Domain.Shared, .HttpApi.Host suffixes
  • 7+ projects in solution

Special handling:

# Copy common.props first
COPY common.props ./

# Follow ABP layer order
# Domain.Shared → Domain → EF Core → Contracts → HttpApi → Application → Host

Clean Architecture Detection

Indicators:

  • Projects in src/Domain/, src/Application/, src/Infrastructure/, src/WebApi/ structure
  • 4-6 projects typically

Layer order:

Domain → Application → Infrastructure → WebApi

Simple API Detection

Indicators:

  • 2-3 projects total
  • Names like *.Models, *.Api, *.Data

Strategy: Single publish, no progressive layers needed.

Validation Checklist

After generation, I'll verify:

  • BuildKit syntax directive present (# syntax=docker/dockerfile:1-labs)
  • .NET version matches project <TargetFramework>
  • Alpine images used for SDK
  • Non-root user configured (USER app)
  • Ports correctly exposed (8080, 8081)
  • --parents flag used in COPY commands
  • Projects ordered by dependency (inner → outer)
  • Progressive publishing for complex projects (≥4 projects)
  • Quiet mode enabled (-v q)
  • BUILD_CONFIGURATION parameterized
  • /p:UseAppHost=false set
  • Entry point references correct DLL
  • .dockerignore excludes build artifacts
  • Build scripts have version validation
  • common.props copied if exists (ABP projects)

Common Issues & Solutions

Issue Cause Solution
"Could not find project or directory" Missing --parents flag Add --parents to all COPY commands
"Project reference could not be resolved" Wrong project copy order Order by dependencies (Domain → API)
Build fails in Alpine SDK Package compatibility Use full SDK: mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:9.0
Large image size (>200MB) Not using Alpine runtime Use -alpine
Cache not utilized Wrong layer order Publish stable layers first (Domain before API)
Build script fails No version argument Script validates argument existence
Missing common.props ABP Framework project Copy common.props before project files
Slow rebuilds Single publish approach Switch to progressive publishing

Build Commands Reference

Development Build

# Quick build for testing
docker build -t myproject:dev .

# Build with debug configuration
docker build --build-arg BUILD_CONFIGURATION=Debug -t myproject:debug .

Production Build

# Using build script (recommended)
./build.sh 1.0.0

# Manual build with version
docker build -t mycompany/myproject:1.0.0 -t mycompany/myproject:latest .

Testing the Image

# Run container
docker run -d -p 8080:8080 --name myproject-test myproject:1.0.0

# Check health
curl http://localhost:8080/health

# View logs
docker logs -f myproject-test

# Inspect image size
docker images myproject:1.0.0

# Stop and remove
docker stop myproject-test && docker rm myproject-test

CI/CD Integration

# Build with commit SHA
docker build -t myproject:${GITHUB_SHA} .

# Multi-platform build
docker buildx build --platform linux/amd64,linux/arm64 -t myproject:1.0.0 .

Performance Metrics

Typical improvements with this skill:

Metric Before After Improvement
Image size 450MB 120MB 73% smaller
Build time (full) 180s 200s +20s (one-time cost)
Build time (cached) 180s 15s 92% faster
Layer reuse 30% 85% 2.8x better caching

Note: Progressive publishing adds ~20s to initial build but saves 90%+ on subsequent builds

Best Practices Applied

  1. BuildKit features - --parents flag for automatic path preservation
  2. Layer optimization - Progressive publishing by dependency order
  3. Minimal images - Alpine sdk (sdk:9.0-alpine)
  4. Compatible builds - Full SDK or runtime avoids Alpine musl runtime issues.
  5. Security - Non-root user, specific tags, minimal attack surface
  6. Build efficiency - Quiet mode, ARG parameterization
  7. Caching strategy - Copy .csproj before source, order by stability
  8. Version control - Build scripts with validation and tagging
  9. ABP support - Handles common.props and framework patterns
  10. Production ready - UseAppHost=false, proper entry points

Usage Examples

Simple API:

Containerize my .NET 9 Web API project with Models library

ABP Framework:

Create Docker setup for my ABP Framework solution with HttpApi.Host

Clean Architecture:

Generate optimized Dockerfile for my Clean Architecture DDD solution with 6 projects

Optimization:

My Docker builds are slow, optimize the existing Dockerfile for better caching