| name | specimin-wrap |
| description | Squash commits and create a pull request after feature implementation is complete. Only invoke when user explicitly requests to wrap up, create a PR, prepare for review, or finish the feature. |
| allowed-tools | run_terminal_cmd, read_file |
Feature Wrap-Up Command
Prepare completed work for code review: squash commits, generate PR description, create pull request.
Stage 1: Validate Environment
Actions:
- Check uncommitted changes:
git status - Get current branch:
git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD→ store asCURRENT_BRANCH - Detect main branch (try in order):
Store asgit show-ref --verify --quiet refs/heads/main && echo "main" || \ git show-ref --verify --quiet refs/heads/master && echo "master" || \ echo "unknown"MAIN_BRANCH. If "unknown", ask user: "What is your main branch name?" - Verify branch is not main: If
CURRENT_BRANCH == MAIN_BRANCH, error and exit - Check initialization: Verify
.specimin/plans/{CURRENT_BRANCH}/exists - Read feature context (for PR description generation):
.specimin/plans/{CURRENT_BRANCH}/spec.md.specimin/plans/{CURRENT_BRANCH}/plan.md.specimin/plans/{CURRENT_BRANCH}/implementation.md
Context Extraction Goals (from spec/plan):
- Feature objective (1-2 sentence summary)
- High-level changes by phase/component
- Acceptance criteria
- Testing approach
Error Handling:
- Uncommitted changes:
Warning: Uncommitted changes detected. Commit or stash before wrapping up.→ Exit - On main branch:
Error: Cannot wrap up main branch. Switch to feature branch first.→ Exit - Not initialized:
Error: Specimin not initialized. Run /init first.→ Exit - No commits ahead:
Error: No commits to squash. Branch up to date with {MAIN_BRANCH}.→ Exit ghnot installed:Error: GitHub CLI not installed. Install: https://cli.github.com/→ Exit- Not authenticated:
Error: Not authenticated with GitHub CLI. Run: gh auth login→ Exit
Checkpoint: Verify environment valid (no uncommitted changes, on feature branch, has commits to squash) before proceeding.
Stage 2: Review Changes
Show user what will be squashed:
Commit history:
git log {MAIN_BRANCH}..HEAD --onelineChange summary:
git diff {MAIN_BRANCH}...HEAD --statFiles changed:
git diff {MAIN_BRANCH}...HEAD --name-only
Present:
I'll squash these commits into one:
[commit history]
Files changed:
[file list]
Proceed with squash and PR creation? (yes/no)
Wait for confirmation. If "no", exit gracefully.
Stage 3: Squash Commits
Once confirmed:
Generate commit message:
- Use feature objective from spec.md
- Summarize WHAT changed (not HOW)
- 1-2 sentences max
- Follow conventional commits:
feat:,fix:,refactor:,docs:
Perform squash:
git reset --soft {MAIN_BRANCH} git commit -m "{COMMIT_MESSAGE}"CRITICAL: No
--author, noCo-Authored-By:, no co-authoring metadata. User authorship only.Verify squash:
git log --oneline -1Confirm only one commit since main branch.
Checkpoint: Verify squash succeeded (single commit, correct message) before creating PR.
Stage 4: Create Pull Request
Generate PR title:
- Use commit message or feature name from spec
- Under 72 characters
- Clear and descriptive
Generate PR description (use template below with extracted context):
## Summary
{1-2 sentence feature objective from spec.md}
## Changes
{Bulleted list of high-level changes from plan.md phases or implementation.md completed tasks}
## Testing
{Testing approach from plan.md, or manual test scenarios}
## Acceptance Criteria
{Criteria from spec.md}
Create PR:
gh pr create --title "{PR_TITLE}" --body "$(cat <<'EOF' {PR_DESCRIPTION} EOF )"Display result:
✓ Squashed {N} commits into 1 commit ✓ Created pull request: {PR_URL} Your feature is ready for review!
No upstream remote: gh pr create will prompt to push if needed.
Complete Examples
Example 1: Simple CRUD Feature
Spec objective: "Add user profile management allowing users to update their name and email"
Commit message:
feat: add user profile management with update functionality
PR title:
feat: add user profile management
PR description:
## Summary
Add user profile management allowing users to update their name and email through a settings page.
## Changes
- Added User schema with name and email fields
- Implemented update_user/2 function with validation
- Created ProfileLive page with edit form
- Added integration tests for profile updates
## Testing
- Unit tests: Accounts.update_user/2 with valid/invalid inputs
- Integration tests: ProfileLive form submission and validation errors
- Manual: Navigate to /profile, update name/email, verify saved
## Acceptance Criteria
- [x] Users can view current profile information
- [x] Users can update name and email
- [x] Invalid emails show validation errors
- [x] Changes persist after page refresh
Example 2: Complex Integration Feature
Spec objective: "Integrate Stripe payment processing with retry logic and webhook handling for subscription management"
Commit message:
feat: integrate Stripe payment processing with webhook support
PR title:
feat: integrate Stripe payment processing
PR description:
## Summary
Integrate Stripe payment processing with automatic retry logic for failed charges and webhook handlers for subscription lifecycle events.
## Changes
- Added Stripe client module with exponential backoff retry logic
- Implemented payment processing functions (create_charge, refund_charge)
- Created webhook handler for subscription events (created, updated, canceled)
- Added Payment schema and database migrations
- Implemented error handling for network failures and invalid cards
## Testing
- Unit tests: StripeClient module with mocked HTTP responses
- Integration tests: Payment creation flow with test API keys
- Webhook tests: Event handling for all subscription states
- Manual: Create test charge in Stripe dashboard, verify webhook receipt
## Acceptance Criteria
- [x] Charges created successfully with valid cards
- [x] Network failures retry up to 3 times with backoff
- [x] Invalid cards return clear error messages
- [x] Webhooks update subscription status in database
- [x] Payment history visible to users
Note: This prompt optimized using research-backed principles: token efficiency (-30%), verification checkpoints (Reflexion 91%), consolidated examples (2-5 optimal), explicit context extraction (CGRAG 4x improvement), and minimal preamble (GPT-5-Codex guidance).