Claude Code Plugins

Community-maintained marketplace

Feedback

Task implementation skill for spec-driven workflows. Reads specifications, identifies next actionable tasks, and creates detailed execution plans. Use when ready to implement a task from an existing spec - bridges the gap between planning and coding.

Install Skill

1Download skill
2Enable skills in Claude

Open claude.ai/settings/capabilities and find the "Skills" section

3Upload to Claude

Click "Upload skill" and select the downloaded ZIP file

Note: Please verify skill by going through its instructions before using it.

SKILL.md

name sdd-implement
description Task implementation skill for spec-driven workflows. Reads specifications, identifies next actionable tasks, and creates detailed execution plans. Use when ready to implement a task from an existing spec - bridges the gap between planning and coding.

SDD-Implement: Concise Playbook

Overview

  • Purpose: Task execution workflow - select tasks, plan implementation, and track progress within an active spec.
  • Scope: Single-task execution with user approval at key checkpoints.
  • Entry: Invoked by /implement-cmd command after spec has been identified.

Flow

[x?]=decision · (GATE)=user approval · =sequence · =loop · §=section ref

- **Entry** → SelectTask
  - [recommend] → `task action="prepare"` → ShowRecommendation
  - [browse] → `task action="query"` → (GATE: task selection)
- → TypeDispatch
    - [type=verify?] → §VerifyWorkflow
    - [type=task?] → DeepDive
      - `task action="prepare"` → ExtractContext
      - DraftPlan → (GATE: approve plan)
        - [approved] → PreImpl
        - [changes] → ↻ back to DraftPlan
        - [defer] → **Exit**
      - PreImpl: LSP analysis → Explore subagent
      - `task action="update-status" status="in_progress"`
      - **Implement**
      - PostImpl: `task action="complete"` + journal (auto)
      - [success?] → SurfaceNext
        - `task action="prepare"` → ShowNextTask
        - (GATE: continue?) → ↻ back to SelectTask | **Exit**
      - [blocked?] → HandleBlocker
        - `task action="block"` → (GATE: alternatives)
        - [add-dep?] → `task action="add-dependency"` | `task action="add-requirement"`
        - [resolve] → ↻ back to Implement
        - [skip] → SurfaceNext

§VerifyWorkflow → see references/verification.md

Flow notation: see docs/flow-notation.md


MCP Tooling

This skill interacts solely with the Foundry MCP server (foundry-mcp). Tools use the router+action pattern: mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__<router> with action="<action>".

Router Key Actions
task prepare, query, info, start, complete, update-status, block, unblock, add-dependency, add-requirement
journal add, list
lifecycle activate, move, complete
spec find, list
intake add, list, dismiss

Critical Rules:

  • The agent never invokes the CLI directly
  • Stay inside the repo root, avoid chained shell commands
  • NEVER read raw spec JSON outside of MCP helpers

CRITICAL: Global Requirements

Spec Reading Rules (NEVER VIOLATE)

The skill only interacts with specs via MCP tools:

  • mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__task action="prepare"
  • mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__task action="info"
  • mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__spec action="find"
  • mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__task action="query"

Direct JSON access (Read(), cat, jq, grep, etc.) is prohibited.

User Interaction Requirements

Gate key decisions with AskUserQuestion (MANDATORY):

  • Spec selection (when multiple available)
  • Task selection (recommended vs alternatives)
  • Plan approval (before implementation)
  • Blocker handling (alternative tasks or resolve)
  • Completion verification (for verify tasks)
  • Continuation after task completion (when context < 85% and more tasks remain)

Anti-Pattern: Never use text-based numbered lists. Always use AskUserQuestion for structured choices.

Anti-Recursion Rule (NEVER VIOLATE)

This skill must NEVER invoke itself or Skill(sdd-implement). The only valid callers are:

  • The /implement command (entry point)
  • Direct user invocation

If you find yourself about to call Skill(sdd-implement) from within this skill, STOP and proceed with the workflow instead. The skill handles the complete task lifecycle - there is no need to re-invoke it.

For detailed context gathering patterns, see references/context-gathering.md For agent delegation patterns (when to use sdd-planner), see references/agent-delegation.md


Task Workflow

Execute one task at a time with explicit user approval.

Assumption: The /next-cmd command has already identified the active spec and passed it to this skill.

Select Task

  • Recommendation path: mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__task action="prepare" -> surface task id, file, estimates, blockers
  • Browsing path: Use mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__task action="query" -> present shortlist via AskUserQuestion

Task Type Dispatch

After selecting a task, check its type to determine the workflow path.

Check task type from the task action="prepare" response or via mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__task action="info":

Task Type Workflow Path
type: "verify" Go to Verification Task Workflow
type: "task" (default) Continue to Deep Dive & Plan Approval

CRITICAL: Verification tasks must NOT go through the implementation workflow. They require MCP tool invocation, not code changes.

Deep Dive & Plan Approval (Implementation Tasks Only)

Note: This section is for type: "task" only. Verification tasks (type: "verify") use the Verification Task Workflow.

Invoke mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__task action="prepare" with the target spec_id. The response contains:

  • task_data: title, metadata, instructions
  • dependencies: blocking status (can_start, blocked_by list)
  • context: previous sibling, parent task, phase, sibling files, journal, dependencies

Treat context as the authoritative source. Only fall back to mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__task action="info" when the spec explicitly requires absent data.

For context field details and JSON structure, see references/context-structure.md

Draft execution plan:

  1. Confirm previous edits in context.sibling_files
  2. Align deliverables with context.parent_task
  3. Call out open risks via context.phase
  4. Reference context.previous_sibling.summary for continuity

Present plan via AskUserQuestion:

  • Options: "Approve & Start", "Request Changes", "More Details", "Defer"

Subagent Guidance (Pre-Implementation Exploration)

Before implementing, use Claude Code's built-in subagents for efficient codebase exploration:

Scenario Subagent Thoroughness
Find related files/patterns Explore medium
Understand unfamiliar code areas Explore very thorough
Complex multi-file investigation general-purpose N/A

Example invocation:

Use the Explore agent (medium thoroughness) to find:
- Existing implementations of similar patterns
- Test files for the target module
- Related documentation that may need updates

Benefits of subagent exploration:

  • Prevents context bloat in main conversation
  • Haiku model is faster for search operations
  • Returns focused results for detailed analysis
  • Keeps main context available for implementation

For more subagent patterns including autonomous mode usage, see references/subagent-patterns.md

LSP Dependency Analysis

Before implementing, use LSP tools to verify dependencies and preview impact:

  1. Verify dependencies exist: Use goToDefinition on symbols the task modifies
  2. Preview impact: Use findReferences to identify all affected files and call sites
  3. Include in plan: Surface LSP findings (usage count, affected files, test coverage) in plan approval
  4. Fallback: If LSP unavailable for file type, use Explore agent to find imports and usages

Verification Scoping

Before implementing, check context.parent_task.children for sibling verify tasks to determine appropriate verification scope:

Phase Has Verify Task? Implementation Task Should
Yes (e.g., "Run tests") Defer formal testing to verify task. Only do basic checks: imports work, no syntax errors, code compiles
No Run tests as part of implementation (include results in journal)

Detection: Look for siblings with type: "verify" in the task action="prepare" response's context.parent_task.children array.

Rationale: When the spec author created a verify task, they intended testing to be a separate tracked step. Respect this structure by deferring formal test execution to the verify task.

Include in plan: State verification scope in the execution plan presented for approval (e.g., "Basic verification only - full tests handled by verify-1-1").

Implementation Handoff

Before coding:

mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__task action="update-status" spec_id={spec-id} task_id={task-id} status="in_progress" note="context"

During implementation:

  • Follow execution plan
  • Document any deviations immediately

After implementation:

Mark task complete using the atomic complete action (updates status AND journals automatically):

mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__task action="complete" spec_id={spec-id} task_id={task-id} completion_note="Summary of what was accomplished, tests run, verification performed"

This atomically:

  1. Updates task status to completed
  2. Records completion timestamp
  3. Creates a journal entry
  4. Auto-journals parent nodes (phases) when they complete

Bikelane (Autonomous Capture)

Proactively add to bikelane when you encounter:

  • Ideas/improvements beyond current task scope
  • Bugs noticed but not immediately actionable
  • Documentation gaps or confusing behavior
mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__intake action="add" title="[Type] description" source="sdd-implement"

Do NOT prompt the user. Silently capture and continue working.

For capture patterns and examples, see references/bikelane.md

Surface Next Recommendation

Context Awareness: The context-monitor hook automatically warns when context exceeds 85%. If you see [CONTEXT X%] warnings, follow the recommendation to /clear then /next-cmd after completing the current task.

Surface next recommendation:

mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__task action="prepare" spec_id={spec-id}
  • Summarize next task's scope and blockers
  • If no pending work or spec complete, surface that clearly and exit

MANDATORY: Continuation Gate

After surfacing the next task, you MUST prompt the user with AskUserQuestion:

  • When context < 85%: Ask "Continue to next task?" with options: "Yes, continue" / "No, exit"
  • When context >= 85%: Exit with guidance to /clear then /next-cmd
  • When spec is complete: Report completion status and exit (no prompt needed)

This gate ensures the user controls the workflow pace and prevents runaway execution.

For post-implementation checklist, see references/checklist.md


CRITICAL: Completion Requirements

Never Mark Complete If:

  • Basic checks fail (imports, syntax, compiles)
  • Tests are failing (only applies if no sibling verify task - see Verification Scoping)
  • Implementation is partial
  • You encountered unresolved errors
  • You couldn't find necessary files or dependencies
  • Blockers exist that prevent verification

If Blocked or Incomplete:

  • Keep task as in_progress
  • Create new task describing what needs resolution
  • Document blocker using mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__task action="block"
  • Present alternatives to user via AskUserQuestion

Dependency Discovery During Implementation

When you discover a missing dependency or new requirement during implementation, record it without leaving the task context:

# Discovered that this task needs another task completed first
mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__task action="add-dependency" spec_id={spec-id} task_id={task-id} depends_on={dependency-task-id}

# Discovered a new acceptance requirement (e.g., from testing)
mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__task action="add-requirement" spec_id={spec-id} task_id={task-id} requirement="Description of discovered requirement"

Use Cases:

  • add-dependency: Task A needs Task B's output → add B as dependency
  • add-requirement: Testing revealed an edge case → add as acceptance criterion

Resolving Blocked Tasks

mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__task action="unblock" spec_id={spec-id} task_id={task-id} resolution="Brief description"

Completion Journal Requirements

MUST provide journal content describing:

  • What was accomplished
  • Verification performed (scope depends on sibling verify tasks - see Verification Scoping):
    • If phase has verify tasks: "Basic checks passed (imports, syntax). Full testing deferred to {verify-task-id}"
    • If no verify tasks: "Tests run and results: {summary}"
  • Any deviations from plan
  • Files created/modified

Example (with sibling verify task - deferred testing):

mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__task action="complete" spec_id="my-spec-001" task_id="task-1-2" completion_note="Implemented phase-add-bulk handler. Basic verification: imports work, no syntax errors. Full test run deferred to verify-1-1. Created src/tools/authoring.py handler (200 lines)."

Example (without sibling verify task - full testing):

mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__task action="complete" spec_id="my-spec-001" task_id="task-2-3" completion_note="Implemented JWT auth middleware with PKCE flow. All 12 unit tests passing. Manual verification: login flow works in dev environment. Created src/middleware/auth.ts (180 lines) and tests/middleware/auth.spec.ts (45 tests)."

Verification Task Workflow

Entry: Routed here from Task Type Dispatch when task has type: "verify"

For the complete verification workflow (mark in progress, detect type, dispatch, execute, complete/remediate), see references/verification.md


Detailed Reference

For comprehensive documentation including:

Task Execution:

  • Context gathering best practices → references/context-gathering.md
  • Agent delegation patterns → references/agent-delegation.md
  • Deep dive context JSON structure → references/context-structure.md
  • Built-in subagent patterns → references/subagent-patterns.md
  • Post-implementation checklist → references/checklist.md
  • Verification task workflow → references/verification.md
  • Bikelane quick capture → references/bikelane.md

Task Lifecycle:

  • Task status transitions → references/task-lifecycle.md
  • Progress tracking & verification → references/progress-tracking.md
  • Journaling decisions & deviations → references/journaling.md
  • Spec folder management → references/spec-lifecycle.md

General:

  • Troubleshooting → references/troubleshooting.md