Claude Code Plugins

Community-maintained marketplace

Feedback

Comprehensive code review and analysis. AUTO-TRIGGERS when user asks to review, refactor, debug, critique, or analyze code.

Install Skill

1Download skill
2Enable skills in Claude

Open claude.ai/settings/capabilities and find the "Skills" section

3Upload to Claude

Click "Upload skill" and select the downloaded ZIP file

Note: Please verify skill by going through its instructions before using it.

SKILL.md

name code-review-skill
description Comprehensive code review and analysis. AUTO-TRIGGERS when user asks to review, refactor, debug, critique, or analyze code.
keywords review, refactor, debug, critique, analyze code, code quality, bugs, vulnerabilities, performance, best practices

Code Review Skill

What This Skill Does

This skill automatically activates when you ask Claude to review, refactor, debug, or analyze code. It's a demonstration of the auto-trigger pattern—the skill detects your intent and applies specialized code review expertise without you explicitly requesting "code review mode."

Auto-Trigger Keywords

This skill engages when you mention:

  • "review" (code review, peer review, security review)
  • "refactor" (improve, restructure, simplify)
  • "debug" (find the bug, what's wrong, why doesn't it work)
  • "analyze" (code analysis, code smell, technical debt)
  • "critique" (code critique, feedback, improvement)
  • "vulnerabilities" (security issues, exploits, vulnerabilities)
  • "performance" (optimization, slow, inefficient)
  • "best practices" (coding standards, conventions, idiomatic)

Review Workflow

Step 1: Understand the Context

  • Identify the programming language
  • Determine the purpose/intent of the code
  • Note the specific area of focus (performance, security, clarity, etc.)

Step 2: Structured Analysis

Review across these dimensions:

  1. Correctness - Does it do what it's supposed to?
  2. Readability - Is the code clear and maintainable?
  3. Performance - Are there inefficiencies?
  4. Security - Are there vulnerabilities or risks?
  5. Best Practices - Does it follow language conventions?
  6. Testing - Is the code testable? Are edge cases handled?

Step 3: Provide Feedback

  • Highlight what works well (positive feedback)
  • Point out specific issues with line references
  • Suggest concrete improvements
  • Explain the "why" behind recommendations

Step 4: Prioritize Suggestions

  • Critical - Security issues, bugs, breaking issues
  • Important - Performance, maintainability, design
  • Nice-to-have - Style, minor improvements

Review Scenarios (Examples)

Example 1: Security Review

User: "Review this for vulnerabilities"

import hashlib
password = input("Enter password: ")
hash = hashlib.md5(password.encode()).hexdigest()

Response: (Auto-triggers code-review-skill)

  • Point out: MD5 is cryptographically broken
  • Suggest: Use bcrypt, scrypt, or Argon2 instead
  • Explain: MD5 is vulnerable to collision attacks

Example 2: Refactoring Request

User: "How can I refactor this to be cleaner?"

if x > 5:
    if y > 10:
        if z < 3:
            print("conditions met")

Response: (Auto-triggers code-review-skill)

  • Suggest: Use logical operators to flatten nesting
  • Show: if x > 5 and y > 10 and z < 3:
  • Explain: Reduces cognitive complexity

Example 3: Performance Analysis

User: "This code is slow, find the bottleneck"

result = []
for item in large_list:
    if item not in result:
        result.append(item)

Response: (Auto-triggers code-review-skill)

  • Identify: O(n²) behavior due to list lookup
  • Suggest: Use set() for O(1) lookups
  • Show: result = list(set(large_list))

Example 4: Bug Hunting

User: "Debug this—there's a logic error"

for (let i = 0; i <= arr.length; i++) {
    console.log(arr[i]);
}

Response: (Auto-triggers code-review-skill)

  • Spot: Off-by-one error (i <= arr.length)
  • Explain: arr[arr.length] is undefined
  • Fix: Change <= to <

Key Points

  • Auto-trigger is implicit - Just ask about code quality/bugs, and this skill engages
  • Context-aware - Adapts to language, domain, and review focus
  • Positive & constructive - Always acknowledge good practices first
  • Specific feedback - Reference line numbers and concrete examples
  • Educational - Explain the "why" behind suggestions

When This Skill Doesn't Apply

This skill focuses on code itself. For other needs, use different tools:

  • Architecture design → Use planning/design tools
  • Project setup → Use project initialization tools
  • Documentation → Use documentation skills
  • Testing framework selection → Use research skills

Review Priorities

Always check first (if relevant):

  1. Security vulnerabilities
  2. Correctness/logic bugs
  3. Performance critical paths
  4. Maintainability
  5. Style/conventions

Only after above are addressed: 6. Minor improvements 7. Code style preferences 8. Formatting